Base58Check encoding - Bitcoin Wiki

[OWL WATCH] Waiting for "IOTA TIME" 30;

Disclaimer: This is sort of my own arbitrary editing, so there could be some misunderstandings.
I root for the spread of good spirits and transparency of IF.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 2:45
So why don't we just copy Avalanche? Well that's pretty simple ...
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 2:47
1. It doesn't scale very well with the amount of nodes in the network that have no say in the consensus process but are merely consensus consuming nodes (i.e. sensors, edge devices and so on). If you assume that the network will never have more than a few thousand nodes then thats fine but if you want to build a DLT that can cope with millions of devices then it wont work because of the message complexity.
2. If somebody starts spamming conflicts, then the whole network will stop to confirm any transactions and will grind to a halt until the conflict spamming stops. Avalanche thinks that this is not a huge problem because an attacker would have to spend fees for spamming conflicts which means that he couldn't do this forever and would at some point run out of funds.
IOTA tries to build a feeless protocol and a consensus that stops to function if somebody spams conflicts is really not an option for us.
3. If a medium sized validator goes offline due to whatever reason, then the whole network will again stop to confirm any transactions because whenever a query for a nodes opinion can not be answered they reset the counter for consecutive successful voting rounds which will prevent confirmations. Since nodes need to open some ports to be available for queries it is super easy to DDOS validators and again bring the network confirmations to 0.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:05
4. Avalanche still processes transactions in "chunks/blocks" by only applying them after they have gone through some consensus process (gathered enough successfull voting rounds), which means that the nodes will waste a significant amount of time where they "wait" for the next chunk to be finished before the transactions are applied to the ledger state. IOTA tries to streamline this process by decoupling consensus and the booking of transactions by using the "parallel reality based ledger state" which means that nodes in IOTA will never waste any time "waiting" for decisions to be made. This will give us much higher throughput numbers.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:11
5. Avalanche has some really severe game theoretic problems where nodes are incentivized to attach their transactions to the already decided parts of the DAG because then things like conflict spam won't affect these transactions as badly as the transactions issued by honest nodes. If however every node would follow this "better and selfish" tip selection mechanism then the network will stop to work at all.
Overall the "being able to stop consensus" might not be too bad since you can't really do anything really bad (i.e. double spend) which is why we might not see these kind of attacks in the immediate future but just wait until a few DeFi apps are running on their platform where smart contracts are actually relying on more or less real time execution of the contracts. Then there might be some actual financial gains to be made if the contract halts and we might see alot of these things appear (including selfish tip selection).
Avalanche is barely a top 100 project and nobody attacks these kind of low value networks unless there is something to be gained from such an attack. Saying that the fact that its live on mainnet and hasn't been attacked in 3 weeks is a proof for its security is completely wrong.
Especially considering that 95% of all stake are controlled by avalanche itself
If you control > 50% of the voting power then you essentially control the whole network and attacks can mostly be ignored
I guess there is a reason for avalanche only selling 10% of the token supply to the public because then some of the named problems are less likely to appear
Navin Ramachandran [IF]어제 오후 3:21
I have to say that wtf's suggestion is pretty condescending to all our researchers. It seems heavy on the troll aspect to suggest that we should ditch all our work because iota is only good at industrial adoption. Does wtf actually expect a response to this? Or is this grand standing?
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:22
The whole argument of "why don't you just use X instead of trying to build a better version" is also a completely idiotic argument. Why did ETH write their own protocol if Bitcoin was already around? Well because they saw problems in Bitcoins approach and tried to improve it.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:27
u/Navin Ramachandran [IF] Its like most of his arguments ... remember when he said we should implement colored coins in 2nd layer smart contracts instead of the base layer because they would be more expressive (i.e. turing complete) completely discarding that 2nd layer smart contracts only really work if you have a consensus on data and therefore state for which you need the "traceability" of funds to create these kind of mini blockchains in the tangle?
Colored coins "enable" smart contracts and it wouldnt work the other way round - unless you have a platform that works exactly like ETH where all the nodes validate a single shared execution platform of the smart contracts which is not really scalable and is exactly what we are trying to solve with our approach.
Navin Ramachandran [IF]어제 오후 3:28
Always easier to criticise than build something yourself. But yet he keeps posting these inflammatory posts.
At this point is there any doubt if he is making these comments constructively?
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:43
If he at least would try to understand IOTAs vision ... then maybe he wouldn't have to ask things like "Why don't you just copy a tech that only works with fees"
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 4:35
I thought this would only be used to 'override' finality, eg if there were network splits. But not in normal consensus
That is not correct. Every single transaction gets booked on arrival using the parallel reality based ledger state. If there are conflicts then we create a "branch" (container in the ledger state) that represents the perception that this particular double spend would be accepted by consensus. After consensus is reached, the container is simply marked as "accepted" and all transactions that are associated with this branch are immediately confirmed as well. This allows us to make the node use all of its computing ressources 24/7 without having to wait for any kind of decision to be made and allows us to scale the throughput to its physical limits. That's the whole idea of the "parallel reality based ledger state" instead of designing a data structure that models the ledger state "after consensus" like everybody else is doing it is tailored to model the ledger state "before consensus" and then you just flip a flag to persist your decision. The "resync mechanism" also uses the branches to measure the amount of approval a certain perception of the ledger state receives. So if my own opinion is not in line with what the rest of the network has accepted (i.e. because I was eclipsed or because there was a network split), then I can use the weight of these branches to detect this "being out of sync" and can do another larger query to re-evaluate my decision.(수정됨)
Also what happens in IOTA if DRNG notes would fall out, does the network continue if no new RNGs appear for a while? Or will new nodes be added sufficiently fast to the DRNG committee that no one notices?
Its a comittee and not just a single DRNG provider. If a few nodes fail then it will still produce random numbers. And even if the whole comittee fails there are fallback RNG's that would be used instead
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 4:58
And multiverse doesn't use FPC but only the weight of these branches in the same way as blockchain uses the longest chain wins consensus to choose between conflicts. So nodes simply attach their transactions to the transactions that they have seen first and if there are conflicts then you simply monitor which version received more approval and adjust your opinion accordingly.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 5:07
We started integrating some of the non-controversial concepts (like the approval reset switch) into FPC and are currently refactoring goshimmer to support this
We are also planning to make the big mana holders publish their opinion in the tangle as a public statement, which allows us to measure the rate of approval in a similar way as multiverse would do it
So its starting to converge a bit but we are still using FPC as a metastability breaking mechanism
Once the changes are implemented it should be pretty easy to simulate and test both approaches in parallel
Serguei Popov [IF]어제 오후 5:53
So the ask is that we ditch all our work and fork Avalanche because it has not been attacked in the month or so it has been up?
u/Navin Ramachandran [IF] yeah, that's hilarious. Avalanche consensus (at least their WP version) is clearly scientifically unsound.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 9:43
u/wtf maybe you should research avalanche before proposing such a stupid idea
and you will see that what I wrote is actually true
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 9:44
paying fees is what "protects" them atm
and simply the fact that nobody uses the network for anything of value yet
we cant rely on fees making attack vectors "inattractive"
Serguei Popov [IF]어제 오후 10:17
well (1.) very obviously the metastability problems are not a problem in practice,
putting "very obviously" before questionable statements very obviously shows that you are seeking a constructive dialogue 📷 (to make metastability work, the adversary needs to more-or-less know the current opinion vectors of most of the honest participants; I don't see why a sufficiently well-connected adversary cannot query enough honest nodes frequently enough to achieve that)
(2.) .... you'd need an unpredictable number every few tens/hundreds milliseconds, but your DRNG can only produce one every O(seconds).
the above assumption (about "every few tens/hundreds milliseconds") is wrong
We've had this discussion before, where you argued that the assumptions in the FPC-BI paper (incl. "all nodes must be known") are not to be taken 100% strictly, and that the results are to be seen more of an indication of overall performance.
Aham, I see. So, unfortunately, all that time that I invested into explaining that stuff during our last conversation was for nothing. Again, very briefly. The contents of the FPC-BI paper is not "an indication of overall performance". It rather shows (to someone who actually read and understood the paper) why the approach is sound and robust, as it makes one understand what is the mechanism that causes the consensus phenomenon occur.
Yet you don't allow for that same argument to be valid for the "metastability" problem in avalanche,
Incorrect. It's not "that same argument". FPC-BI is a decent academic paper that has precisely formulated results and proofs. The Ava WP (the probabilistic part of it), on the other hand, does not contain proofs of what they call results. More importantly, they don't even show a clear path to those proofs. That's why their system is scientifically unsound.
even when there's a live network that shows that it doesn't matter.
No, it doesn't show that it doesn't matter. It only shows that it works when not properly attacked. Their WP doesn't contain any insight on why those attacks would be difficult/impossible.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 10:56
That proposal was so stupid - Avalanche does several things completely different and we are putting quite a bit og effort into our solution to pretty much fix all of Avalanches shortcomings
If we just wanted to have a working product and dont care about security or performance then we could have just forked a blockchaib
I am pretty confident that once we are done - its going to be extremely close to the besttheoretical thresholds that DLTs will ever be able to achieve for an unsharded baselayer
Bas어제 오전 2:43
Yesterday I was asked how a reasonably big company no one has heard of could best move forward implementing Access for thousands of locations worldwide. (Sorry for the vagueness, it’s all confidential.) They read the article and want to implement it because it seems to fit a problem they’re currently trying to solve. Such moves will vastly increase the utility of protocols like IOTA, and is what the speculation is built on. I do not think you can overestimate what impact Access is going to have. It’s cutting out the middleman for simple things; no server or service needed. That’s huge.
So yes, I think this space will continue to grow u/Coinnave

Angelo Capossele [IF]2020.10.02.
In short: we are planning a new v0.3.0 release that should happen very soon. This version will bring fundamental changes to the structure of the entire codebase (but without additional features) so that progressing with the development will be easier and more consistent. We have also obtained outstanding results with the dRNG committee managed by the GoShimmer X-Team, so that will also be integral part of v0.3.0. After that, we will merge the Value Tangle with the Message Tangle, so to have only one Tangle and make the TSA and the orphanage easier to manage. And we are also progressing really well with Mana, that will be the focus after the merge. More or less this is what is going to happen this month.
We will release further details with the upcoming Research Status Update 📷

submitted by btlkhs to Iota [link] [comments]

[OWL WATCH] Waiting for "IOTA TIME" 20; Hans's re-defined directions for DLT

Disclaimer: This is my editing, so there could be some misunderstandings...
wellwho오늘 오후 4:50
u/Ben Royce****how far is society2 from having something clickable powered by IOTA?
Ben Royce오늘 오후 4:51
demo of basic tech late sep/ early oct. MVP early 2021
Colored coins are the most misunderstood upcoming feature of the IOTA protocol. A lot of people see them just as a competitor to ERC-20 tokens on ETH and therefore a way of tokenizing things on IOTA, but they are much more important because they enable "consensus on data".
All this stuff already works on neblio but decentralized and scaling to 3500 tps
Neblio has 8 mb blocks with 30 seconds blocktime. This is a throughput of 8 mb / 30 seconds = 267 kb per second. Transactions are 401+ bytes which means that throughput is 267 kb / 401 bytes = 665 TPS. IOTA is faster, feeless and will get even faster with the next update ...
Which DLT would be more secure? One that is collaboratively validated by the economic actors of the world (coporations, companies, foundations, states, people) or one that is validated by an anonymous group of wealthy crypto holders?
The problem with current DLTs is that we use protection mechanisms like Proof of Work and Proof of Stake that are inherently hard to shard. The more shards you have, the more you have to distribute your hashing power and your stake and the less secure the system becomes.
Real world identities (i.e. all the big economic actors) however could shard into as many shards as necessary without making the system less secure. Todays DLTs waste trust in the same way as PoW wastes energy.
Is a secure money worth anything if you can't trust the economic actors that you would buy stuff from? If you buy a car from Volkswagen and they just beat you up and throw you out of the shop after you payed then a secure money won't be useful either :P
**I believe that if you want to make DLT work and be successful then we need to ultimately incorporate things like trust in entities into the technology.**Examples likes wirecard show that trusting a single company is problematic but trusting the economy as a whole should be at ...
**... least as secure as todays DLTs.**And as soon as you add sharding it will be orders of magnitude more secure. DLT has failed to deliver because people have tried to build a system in vacuum that completely ignores things that already exist and that you can leverage on.
Blockchain is a bit like people sitting in a room, trying to communicate through BINGO sheets. While they talk, they write down some of the things that have been said and as soon as one screams BINGO! he hands around his sheet to inform everybody about what has been said.
If you think that this is the most efficient form of communication for people sitting in the same room and the answer to scalability is to make bigger BINGO sheets or to allow people to solve the puzzle faster then you will most probably never understand what IOTA is working on.
**Blockchain does not work with too many equally weighted validators.****If 400 validators produce a validating statement (block) at the same time then only one can survive as part of a longest chain.**IOTA is all about collaborative validation.
**Another problem of blockchain is that every transaction gets sent twice through the network. Once from the nodes to the miners and a 2nd time from the miners as part of a block.**Blockchain will therefore always only be able to use 50% of the network throughput.
And****the last problem is that you can not arbitrarily decrease the time between blocks as it breaks down if the time between blocks gets smaller than the average network delay. The idle time between blocks is precious time that could be used for processing transactions.
I am not talking about a system with a fixed number of validators but one that is completely open and permissionless where any new company can just spin up a node and take part in the network.
Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are both centralizing sybil-protection mechanism. I don't think that Satoshi wanted 14 mining pools to run the network.
And "economic clustering" was always the "end game" of IOTA.
**Using Proof of Stake is not trustless. Proof of Stake means you trust the richest people and hope that they approve your transactions. The rich are getting richer (through your fees) and you are getting more and more dependant on them.**Is that your vision of the future?

Please read again exactly what I wrote. I have not spoken of introducing governance by large companies, nor have I said that IOTA should be permissioned. We aim for a network with millions or even billions of nodes.

That can't work at all with a permissioned ledger - who should then drop off all these devices or authorize them to participate in the network? My key message was the following: Proof of Work and Proof of Stake will always be if you split them up via sharding ...

... less secure because you simply need fewer coins or less hash power to have the majority of the votes in a shard. This is not the case with trust in society and the economy. When all companies in the world jointly secure a DLT ...

... then these companies could install any number of servers in any number of shards without compromising security, because "trust" does not become less just because they operate several servers. First of all, that is a fact and nothing else.

Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are contrary to the assumption of many not "trustless" but follow the maxim: "In the greed of miners we trust!" The basic assumption that the miners do not destroy the system that generates income for them is fundamental here for the ...

... security of every DLT. I think a similar assumption would still be correct for the economy as a whole: The companies of the world (and not just the big ones) would not destroy the system with which their customers pay them. In this respect, a system would be ...

... which is validated by society and the economy as a whole probably just as "safely" as a system which is validated by a few anonymous miners. Why a small elite of miners should be better validators than any human and ...

... To be honest, companies in this world do not open up to me. As already written in my other thread, safe money does not bring you anything if you have to assume that Volkswagen will beat you up and throw you out of the store after you ...

... paid for a car. The thoughts I discussed say nothing about the immediate future of IOTA (we use for Coordicide mana) but rather speak of a world where DLT has already become an integral part of our lives and we ...

... a corresponding number of companies, non-profit organizations and people have used DLT and where such a system could be implemented. The point here is not to create a governance solution that in any way influences the development of technology ...

... or have to give nodes their OK first, but about developing a system that enables people to freely choose the validators they trust. For example, you can also declare your grandma to be a validator when you install your node or your ...

... local supermarket. Economic relationships in the real world usually form a close-knit network and it doesn't really matter who you follow as long as the majority is honest. I also don't understand your criticism of censorship, because something like that in IOTA ...

... is almost impossible. Each transaction confirms two other transactions which is growing exponentially. If someone wanted to ignore a transaction, he would have to ignore an exponential number of other transactions after a very short time. In contrast to blockchain ...

... validators in IOTA do not decide what is included in the ledger, but only decide which of several double spends should be confirmed. Honest transactions are confirmed simply by having other transactions reference them ...

... and the "validators" are not even asked. As for the "dust problem", this is indeed something that is a bigger problem for IOTA than for other DLTs because we have no fees, but it is also not an unsolvable problem. Bitcoin initially has a ...

Solved similar problem by declaring outputs with a minimum amount of 5430 satoshis as invalid (…). A similar solution where an address must contain a minimum amount is also conceivable for IOTA and we are discussing ...

... several possibilities (including compressing dust using cryptographic methods). Contrary to your assumption, checking such a minimum amount is not slow but just as fast as checking a normal transaction. And mine ...

... In my opinion this is no problem at all for IOTA's use case. The important thing is that you can send small amounts, but after IOTA is feeless it is also okay to expect the recipients to regularly send their payments on a ...

... merge address. The wallets already do this automatically (sweeping) and for machines it is no problem to automate this process. So far this was not a problem because the TPS were limited but with the increased TPS throughput of ...

... Chrysalis it becomes relevant and appropriate solutions are discussed and then implemented accordingly. I think that was the most important thing first and if you have further questions just write :)

And to be very clear! I really appreciate you and your questions and don't see this as an attack at all! People who see such questions as inappropriate criticism should really ask whether they are still objective. I have little time at the moment because ...

... my girlfriend is on tour and has to take care of our daughter, but as soon as she is back we can discuss these things in a video. I think that the concept of including the "real world" in the concepts of DLT is really exciting and ...

... that would certainly be exciting to discuss in a joint video. But again, that's more of a vision than a specific plan for the immediate future. This would not work with blockchain anyway but IOTA would be compatible so why not think about such things.

All good my big one :P But actually not that much has changed. There has always been the concept of "economic clustering" which is basically based on similar ideas. We are just now able to implement things like this for the first time.

Exactly. It would mean that addresses "cost" something but I would rather pay a few cents than fees for each transaction. And you can "take" this minimum amount with you every time you change to a new address.

All good my big one :P But actually not that much has changed. There has always been the concept of "economic clustering" which is basically based on similar ideas. We are just now able to implement things like this for the first time.

Relax오늘 오전 1:17
Btw. Hans (sorry for interrupting this convo) but what make people say that IOTA is going the permissioned way because of your latest tweets? I don't get why some people are now forecasting that... Is it because of missing specs or do they just don't get the whole idea?

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:20
its bullshit u/Relaxan identity based system would still be open and permissionless where everybody can choose the actors that they deem trustworthy themselves but thats anyway just sth that would be applicable with more adoption
[오전 1:20]
for now we use mana as a predecessor to an actual reputation system

Sissors오늘 오전 1:31
If everybody has to choose actors they deem trustworthy, is it still permissionless? Probably will become a bit a semantic discussion, but still

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:34
Of course its permissionless you can follow your grandma if you want to :p

Sissors오늘 오전 1:36
Well sure you can, but you will need to follow something which has a majority of the voting power in the network. Nice that you follow your grandma, but if others dont, her opinion (or well her nodes opinion) is completely irrelevant

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:37
You would ideally follow the people that are trustworthy rather than your local drug dealers yeah

Sissors오늘 오전 1:38
And tbh, sure if you do it like that is easy. If you just make the users responsible for only connection to trustworthy nodes

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:38
And if your grandma follows her supermarket and some other people she deems trustworthy then thats fine as well
[오전 1:38]
+ you dont have just 1 actor that you follow

Sissors오늘 오전 1:38
No, you got a large list, since yo uwant to follow those which actually matter. So you jsut download a standard list from the internet

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:39
You can do that
[오전 1:39]
Is bitcoin permissionless? Should we both try to become miners?
[오전 1:41]
I mean miners that actually matter and not find a block every 10 trillion years 📷
[오전 1:42]
If you would want to become a validator then you would need to build up trust among other people - but anybody can still run a node and issue transactions unlike in hashgraph where you are not able to run your own nodes(수정됨)
[오전 1:48]
Proof of Stake is also not trustless - it just has a builtin mechanism that downloads the trusted people from the blockchain itself (the richest dudes)

Sissors오늘 오전 1:52
I think most agree it would be perfect if every person had one vote. Which is pr oblematic to implement of course. But I really wonder if the solution is to just let users decide who to trust. At the very least I expect a quite centralized network

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:53
of course even a trust based system would to a certain degree be centralized as not every person is equally trustworthy as for example a big cooperation
[오전 1:53]
but I think its gonna be less centralized than PoS or PoW
[오전 1:53]
but anyway its sth for "after coordicide"
[오전 1:54]
there are not enough trusted entities that are using DLT, yet to make such a system work reasonably well
[오전 1:54]
I think the reason why blockchain has not really started to look into these kind of concepts is because blockchain doesnt work with too many equally weighted validators
[오전 1:56]
I believe that DLT is only going to take over the world if it is actually "better" than existing systems and with better I mean cheaper, more secure and faster and PoS and PoW will have a very hard time to deliver that
[오전 1:56]
especially if you consider that its not only going to settle value transfers

Relax오늘 오전 1:57
I like this clear statements, it makes it really clear that DLT is still in its infancy

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:57
currently bank transfers are order of magnitude cheaper than BTC or ETH transactions

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:57
and we you think that people will adopt it just because its crypto then I think we are mistaken
[오전 1:57]
The tech needs to actually solve a problem
[오전 1:57]
and tbh. currently people use PayPal and other companies to settle their payments
[오전 1:58]
having a group of the top 500 companies run such a service together is already much better(수정됨)
[오전 1:58]
especially if its fast and feeless
[오전 2:02]
and the more people use it, the more decentralized it actually becomes
[오전 2:02]
because you have more trustworthy entities to choose of

Evaldas [IF]오늘 오전 2:08
"in the greed of miners we trust"

submitted by btlkhs to Iota [link] [comments]

On F-Droid apps and bitcoin donations

The recent post on FOSS android apps and how they can earn money made me curious about their bitcoin donations, so I slapped together a quick script, grabbed the donation addresses from the F-Droid metadata and queried their total received amount.
The result, sorted by total received and valued using some value of today (9366.36 EUR per BTC)

Package address total EUR 1BPdWwovytfGdBwUDVgqbMZ8omcPQzshpX 100.35295704 939941.92 1BPdWwovytfGdBwUDVgqbMZ8omcPQzshpX 100.35295704 939941.92
com.piratebayfree 1KeBs4HBQzkdHC2ou3gpyGHqcL7aKzwTve 76.80127006 719348.34
org.asnelt.derandom 1NZz4TGpJ1VL4Qmqw7aRAurASAT3Cq5S6s 60.84434648 569890.05
com.nononsenseapps.notepad 16DUL1X4yARfM88GN7TV6Y3wQwqrstJs7A 58.40632213 547054.64 1adrianERDJusC4c8whyT81zAuiENEqub 52.62216723 492878.16
org.fdroid.fdroid.privileged.ota 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.fdroid.privileged 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.fdroid.ota 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.fdroid 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.basic 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.calyxinstitute.vpn 14wntQ8cBdnhUVfYmDjXz6PbpSSX8nCtkr 17.65221369 165336.99
de.tutao.tutanota 3MDrR5gaMvL8sphuQLX6BvPPKYNArdXsv6 10.30485934 96519.02 1GRgEnKujorJJ9VBa76g8cp3sfoWtQqSs4 8.49212217 79540.27
me.tripsit.tripmobile 1EDqf32gw73tc1WtgdT2FymfmDN4RyC9RN 7.00970601 65655.43
player.efis.pfd 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.mfd 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
com.nutomic.zertman 1NUqm2kyaiRdssFaxYd7CQaWy4og19xH5g 5.0 46831.80
com.nutomic.ensichat 1DmU6QVGSKXGXJU1bqmmStPDNsNnYoMJB4 4.99995 46831.33
com.brentpanther.litecoinwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
com.brentpanther.ethereumwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
com.brentpanther.bitcoinwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
com.brentpanther.bitcoincashwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
im.vector.alpha 1LxowEgsquZ3UPZ68wHf8v2MDZw82dVmAE 3.65680571 34250.96
in.p1x.tanks_of_freedom 18oHovhxpevALZFcjH3mgNKB1yLi3nNFRY 3.59251169 33648.76
com.veken0m.bitcoinium 1yjDmiukhB2i1XyVw5t7hpAK4WXo32d54 3.49440553 32729.86 15j7vKgJbixQFZ6AvEFw2BhtA4KG7E14JZ 2.52566983 23656.33
at.bitfire.nophonespam 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.icsdroid 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.gfxtablet 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.davdroid 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.cadroid 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08 1ASnTs4UjXKR8tHnLi9yG42n42hbFYV2um 2.36196229 22122.99
net.sourceforge.wifiremoteplay 1LKCFto9SQGqtcvqZxHkqDPqNjSnfMmsow 2.20225896 20627.15
net.sourceforge.opencamera 1LKCFto9SQGqtcvqZxHkqDPqNjSnfMmsow 2.20225896 20627.15
org.witness.sscphase1 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
org.havenapp.main 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.ripple 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.pixelknot 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.orfox 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.notepadbot 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.locationprivacy 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.lildebi 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.gilga 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.courier 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.checkey 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.cacert 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.browser 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
sk.baka.aedict 1KJyEutxrm3yL7chvsciMJTvXahXoWE3Pw 2.0 18732.72
byrne.utilities.pasteedroid 1L44pgmZpeMsWsd24WgN6SJjEUARG5eY6G 1.93771879 18149.37
byrne.utilities.hashpass 1L44pgmZpeMsWsd24WgN6SJjEUARG5eY6G 1.93771879 18149.37
byrne.utilities.converter 1L44pgmZpeMsWsd24WgN6SJjEUARG5eY6G 1.93771879 18149.37
com.zoffcc.applications.zanavi 1ZANav18WY8ytM7bhnAEBS3bdrTohsD9p 1.3792561 12918.61
eu.domob.shopt 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
eu.domob.bjtrainer 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
eu.domob.angulo 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
eu.domob.anacam 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47 193Xb3sySr2oEMuJC6bqAov444rSyVczW 1.24689782 11678.89
com.ymber.eleven 12aDckQC6YHEn75zReQWxXFCivBBNXfRjM 1.19375821 11181.17
si.modrajagoda.didi 1FU27EyocpFFhexjoakSe7Hxvf4jD2KmFh 1.05 9834.68
com.nononsenseapps.feeder 1PdmeeGxB2iktvmtkGqwUNmYq7L9tnxjwE 1.02972708 9644.79
org.projectmaxs.transport.xmpp bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.wifichange bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.wifiaccess bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smswrite bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smssend bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smsread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smsnotify bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68 bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.ringermode bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.phonestateread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.notification bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.nfc bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.misc bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.locationfine bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.filewrite bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.fileread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.contactsread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.clipboard bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.bluetoothadmin bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.bluetooth bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.alarmset bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.main bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
com.eibriel.reddot 1MD8wCtnx5zqGvkY1VYPNqckAyTWDhXKzY 0.923361 8648.53 1NZCKkUCtJV2U2Y9hDb9uq8S7ksFCFGR6K 0.59356774 5559.57 13nUbfsLUzK9Sr7ZJgDRHNR91BJMuDuJnf 0.51806696 4852.40 1uAEzZrfJt96UHYQheUUC8gSp2TJdwdw3 0.49531493 4639.30
org.kontalk 14vipppSvCG7VdvoYmbhKZ8DbTfv9U1QfS 0.48859802 4576.38
hashengineering.groestlcoin.wallet_test 3BCeMXVny1HbDc4NK64UZs9oFjKZdajBfx 0.48 4495.85
hashengineering.groestlcoin.wallet 3BCeMXVny1HbDc4NK64UZs9oFjKZdajBfx 0.48 4495.85
org.disrupted.rumble 1PXXMinxQgYUPXzZq6BixZpJTFeiCLqDqD 0.44804797 4196.58
se.manyver 3NNGfHL96UrjggaBVQojF1mnGnXNx1SXv7 0.44135235 4133.86
org.schabi.sharewithnewpipe 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.schabi.openhitboxstreams 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.schabi.newpipelegacy 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.schabi.newpipe 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.mariotaku.twidere 1FHAVAzge7cj1LfCTMfnLL49DgA3mVUCuW 0.33555159 3142.90
de.gabbo.forro_lyrics 1MDjHkXQud77UJk6TqmGkjeyhmz67NfE6g 0.32967373 3087.84
org.disroot.disrootapp 1GNmDSXxpU1zaxEopKCJK2TzLh3dbZAxEA 0.32853919 3077.22
com.dfa.hubzilla_android 1GNmDSXxpU1zaxEopKCJK2TzLh3dbZAxEA 0.32853919 3077.22
com.watabou.pixeldungeon 1LyLJAzxCfieivap1yK3iCpGoUmzAnjdyK 0.30544626 2860.92
ca.pr0ps.xposed.entrustunblocker 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
ca.cmetcalfe.xposed.flatconnectivityicons 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
ca.cmetcalfe.xposed.disablebatterywarnings 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
ca.cmetcalfe.locationshare 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
eu.faircode.netguard 13vtPytVVqCwojmohAqsK61Tk4yGXSWpJK 0.28845628 2701.79
org.totschnig.myexpenses 1GCUGCSfFXzSC81ogHu12KxfUn3cShekMn 0.26904759 2520.00
com.termux.window 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.widget 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.tasker 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.styling 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.boot 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.api 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
se.leap.riseupvpn 1F3KowUJBfvocr1H6DRvwFxfETJ18e8Dp6 0.25404247 2379.45
eu.siacs.conversations.voicerecorder 1AeqNAcg85APAZj9BZfAjdFCC5zesqXp2B 0.25226604 2362.81
eu.siacs.conversations.legacy 1AeqNAcg85APAZj9BZfAjdFCC5zesqXp2B 0.25226604 2362.81
com.morphoss.acal 1C7ChLNbwiQNWS6BLCPNU5TzX3ve7Xup2m 0.24548194 2299.27
com.b44t.messenger 18e3zwis2raitdZVhEhHHT7xG6oXsZte9L 0.24530249 2297.59
com.achep.acdisplay 1GYj49ZnMByKj2f6p7r4f92GQi5pR6BSMz 0.23828669 2231.88 1862EpKxs4BGUM6Td2Gs83QCkVC889Eqja 0.23149008 2168.22
com.simplemobiletools.voicerecorder 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.thankyou 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.smsmessenger 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.notes 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.musicplayer 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.flashlight 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.filemanager 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.draw 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.dialer 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.contacts 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.clock 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.calendar 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.calculator 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.applauncher 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96 1MLdh6uAPymWVJ4bmRde684uTcLJWwumkK 0.20361036 1907.09 1MLdh6uAPymWVJ4bmRde684uTcLJWwumkK 0.20361036 1907.09
de.grobox.liberario 12JaQp8zfqRb83JfSwVjH4rZWsZnWRPoyG 0.18405547 1723.93
de.grobox.blitzmail 12JaQp8zfqRb83JfSwVjH4rZWsZnWRPoyG 0.18405547 1723.93
com.todobom.opennotescanner 1H5tqKZoWdqkR54PGe9w67EzBnLXHBFmt9 0.16962324 1588.75
org.libreoffice.impressremote 129jj3HiLfj3zCfqoro3sMTdovizXEdo8A 0.16380002 1534.21 1exodusdyqXD81tS8SkcLhyFj9ioxWsaZ 0.15745937 1474.82 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.notepad 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.flashlight 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.filemanager 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
de.smasi.tickmate 18tub3juj26zyGwdpmGDLgtLEpfFf2Nvhu 0.14452004 1353.63
me.hda.urlhda 1N5czHaoSLukFSTq2ZJujaWGjkmBxv2dT9 0.142 1330.02
com.passcard 1N5czHaoSLukFSTq2ZJujaWGjkmBxv2dT9 0.142 1330.02
org.blokada.alarm 16rJ49uNKCohVhHvWNganP6Y48Ba9BTyKd 0.14151834 1325.51
org.floens.chan 1N7VtcNh8L8u4tF9CJ38GjnPbmxM4Vixi6 0.13177915 1234.29
press.condense.www 325oe18pc8npqHeBGozobnvWfXXe3pujXq 0.12791726 1198.12
org.quantumbadger.redreader 1874wapGxDo2vEp4avisda4gx3SCjsHCQJ 0.12570044 1177.36
wb.receiptspro 3MGikseSB69cGjUkJs4Cqg93s5s8tv38tK 0.12023971 1126.21
be.brunoparmentier.wifikeyshare 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
be.brunoparmentier.dnssetter 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
be.brunoparmentier.apkshare 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
org.smssecure.smssecure 1LoKZXg3bx6kfwAhEFQqS9pgeCE1CFMEJb 0.10927359 1023.50
mobi.boilr.boilr 1PHuSWfuAwR6oz9qV93rTdMVozfM85Qqxx 0.101 946.00
com.morlunk.mountie 1ySD4UzFDtPLq9agRg9eiFtWmz6DJ7bBf 0.09228972 864.42
org.lf_net.pgpunlocker 18ii4wvKxPFvKoGk7MXLngq9yWNsp7ABPd 0.08827862 826.85
com.orpheusdroid.sqliteviewer 1Cbf61y8XNx3BLWvoZB71x4XgBKB7r8BuB 0.07990648 748.43
com.orpheusdroid.screenrecorder 1Cbf61y8XNx3BLWvoZB71x4XgBKB7r8BuB 0.07990648 748.43 1BiGLYBT38ttJhvZkjGc5mCw5uKoRHcUmr 0.06538094 612.38
net.gsantner.markor 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
net.gsantner.dandelior 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
io.github.gsantner.memetastic 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
io.github.froodyapp 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
com.github.dfa.diaspora_android 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
org.woltage.irssiconnectbot 12Xe9L8Kam2F838RipTstT1BAxWLZjWRxh 0.05900001 552.62
dev.ukanth.ufirewall 1LBUdALwYXDv38wvnUSGvsFjituaWAHvFo 0.05663316 530.45
org.totschnig.sendwithftp 1Dmj6keLGgNHBUD5unsbZz5vnk9wRinRAy 0.05247253 491.48
com.github.yeriomin.yalpstore 14HvYHKe6joHbQjVdAPd1Ha1yXaGS2pVTW 0.05018261 470.03
com.github.yeriomin.smsscheduler 14HvYHKe6joHbQjVdAPd1Ha1yXaGS2pVTW 0.05018261 470.03
com.github.yeriomin.dumbphoneassistant 14HvYHKe6joHbQjVdAPd1Ha1yXaGS2pVTW 0.05018261 470.03
org.ethack.orwall 1Kriu9owRhEsFkj8Lc6Wr5xTv8YTNphhXn 0.04385552 410.77
org.indywidualni.fblite 1JUaZytkub2CP5jhRYQDDY6pibqrUUSp2y 0.04214968 394.79
com.anthony.deepl.openl 3DetrDfft3ChjXMQUsTwQL1ozQvBXwGSsQ 0.04 374.65
org.jamienicol.episodes 149XkMSs84ZyzNMqiQeJLt5DbPru16amwA 0.033 309.09
io.github.powerinside.syncplay 16E1hn96zg9h16VCrxSG6p7b72vyNh64ft 0.03048045 285.49
io.github.powerinside.scrollsocket 16E1hn96zg9h16VCrxSG6p7b72vyNh64ft 0.03048045 285.49
nya.miku.wishmaster 1LaumSD5Y9npHxsq9Cqo3esmWiytqv95QW 0.03 280.99
am.ed.importcontacts 14FPuKQfmV31Fx4uxwXvehmM189nxaQpKB 0.02695857 252.50
am.ed.exportcontacts 14FPuKQfmV31Fx4uxwXvehmM189nxaQpKB 0.02695857 252.50
org.tasks 136mW34jW3cmZKhxuTDn3tHXMRwbbaRU8s 0.02141326 200.56
com.moonpi.tapunlock 1NZGAU1rEs1zBpwdjmnBjiyRsJHfycWhSF 0.02106 197.26
com.moonpi.swiftnotes 1NZGAU1rEs1zBpwdjmnBjiyRsJHfycWhSF 0.02106 197.26
org.telegram.messenger 1McafEgMvqAVujNLtcJumZHxp2UfaNByqs 0.02006732 187.96
eu.faircode.xlua 1GePXhRPgLhwQmBwRHhX1nSCgvfnCY97Gg 0.01687755 158.08
org.decsync.sparss.floss 1JWYoV2MZyu8LYYHCur9jUJgGqE98m566z 0.01598957 149.76 1JWYoV2MZyu8LYYHCur9jUJgGqE98m566z 0.01598957 149.76
org.asdtm.goodweather 1FV8m1MKqZ9ZKB8YNwpsjsuubHTznJSiT8 0.01510861 141.51
org.asdtm.fas 1FV8m1MKqZ9ZKB8YNwpsjsuubHTznJSiT8 0.01510861 141.51
com.nma.util.sdcardtrac 16bxTv1fP8X2QN5SWXc1AcKhhA1tJQKcTa 0.015 140.50
com.kunzisoft.keyboard.switcher 1DSwXCk7Sob24sNsofywNoRQw2f5Qj5t2F 0.01473243 137.99
com.kunzisoft.keepass.libre 1DSwXCk7Sob24sNsofywNoRQw2f5Qj5t2F 0.01473243 137.99
fr.kwiatkowski.ApkTrack 19wFVDUWhrjRe3rPCsokhcf1w9Stj3Sr6K 0.01440284 134.90
com.stripe1.xmouse 17DaqbcEEG3Hn5jBv3sRjPTUUCW1eBp1Wg 0.01358135 127.21
org.nutritionfacts.dailydozen 3GQUrb9sw36MoQeZNJ4g16CCNqgr3Va6bx 0.0118 110.52
com.stoutner.privacybrowser.standard 1Jiooc5L238VnhiWtkdYEkwm7kRNWQspSC 0.01159484 108.60
org.sufficientlysecure.termbot 1LY6Hs6SurATjfxnihzLMDUMUuMxvQ4aEi 0.01151042 107.81
org.sufficientlysecure.keychain 1LY6Hs6SurATjfxnihzLMDUMUuMxvQ4aEi 0.01151042 107.81
com.zeapo.pwdstore 1H1Z1NPTrR5Cej9bKV3Hu4f5WJZYtkbpox 0.01141762 106.94
pk.contender.earmouse 1FdwmPaKhE6pmPRxNHcWh3yFDo3mdtMPy 0.01041024 97.51
im.quicksy.client 3KAD8vew6tPZDjiUJNnZ3YUoUxrCEVNwFL 0.01024848 95.99
eu.siacs.conversations 3KAD8vew6tPZDjiUJNnZ3YUoUxrCEVNwFL 0.01024848 95.99 18FLvxn8Vgz5DTgVH1kT4DRJoaANpWhqvP 0.01 93.66
at.linuxtage.companion 1GLTBBirbj8GZ8uY1gwovZ1QEMjfWu3rWT 0.01 93.66 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95
se.leap.bitmaskclient 1Fze6GLjoxFnwAGNreYLK8ktFdGJdPRxeY 0.00763591 71.52
com.saha.batchuninstaller 3GRYNKRUFsefuvKuTycgbMjB4DFxUXVys4 0.007 65.56
org.sufficientlysecure.viewer.fontpack 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.viewer 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.standalonecalendar 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.localcalendar 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.ical 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.shortcuts 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.ntpsync 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.fastergps 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.birthdayadapter 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
com.moez.QKSMS 3ELLdraJTuJB2CtQACZiAuf1X3udeAsRgP 0.00403494 37.79
org.xposeddownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
org.opengappsdownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
org.basketbuilddownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
org.afhdownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
com.gianlu.aria2app 18rrPNGgz8UkzUYgAnqVye83xEe5fB7XfY 0.00330638 30.97
com.gianlu.aria2android 18rrPNGgz8UkzUYgAnqVye83xEe5fB7XfY 0.00330638 30.97
com.oriondev.moneywallet 1J3APoaFT2jcqRzpb8bEt2rwUn3mDpWE5U 0.00290149 27.18
com.omegavesko.holocounter 19J43UNjckM9Q2M59ZM8ptCW5kA1dWdHdp 0.00277121 25.96
ir.hsn6.turo 1PUJ5sFWxvbx5Np2CjFmhHFnzPe2GPvinj 0.00271154 25.40
com.fr3ts0n.stagefever 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.ecu.gui.androbd 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.androbd.plugin.sensorprovider 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.androbd.plugin.mqtt 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.androbd.plugin.gpsprovider 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06 3BSbGRbJaiSxVg3D6nVRK5C1SZEezhjtK5 0.00214369 20.08
eu.uwot.fabio.altcoinprices 353x3kNMUaAt3i79kQTf3KCJWRAVXSRGpW 0.00213 19.95
ch.bailu.aat 3GK4KLiqKqGg5UQxdkkGXhhDZkdFFicy5T 0.002 18.73
org.elijaxapps.androidxmrigminer 37GpugVZNiof2DzWQX5aivHewc4wZLxATL 0.00189005 17.70 16tan5fBNJ6n1QmVxwvvondyvuwgx1W6fE 0.00177442 16.62
com.goltzkiste.guessaday 1Guessas8CtCA9S9ZA9p9fCFAD3VZTE9ey 0.00176227 16.51
net.khertan.forrunners 1s38rpyuJvfvcRFaESZmVSp6EYpVLEDWU 0.00134051 12.56
de.schildbach.oeffi bc1qxm9r8n3pe47r30e04gs2xsalxef55zrfvelvln 0.0012577 11.78
org.gdroid.gdroid 1J2bbhJYksSjeynGGhuSPN9aTEaxiGm4nR 0.001 9.37 1J2bbhJYksSjeynGGhuSPN9aTEaxiGm4nR 0.001 9.37
org.zamedev.gloomydungeons2.opensource 1BkmsNEeW5A2YketBaa4pDFSAcDwnDuyDp 0.00099 9.27
net.fabiszewski.ulogger bc1qt3uwhze9x8tj6v73c587gprhufg9uur0rzxhvh 0.00097941 9.17
ir.hsn6.trans 1MkJyXh8y3ViXTAFhKUpXfgfECEfnZmLGY 0.00080184 7.51
net.frju.flym 3DprwFMg5bXGz8QimyiaoEE7mmCkj2DGf5 0.00068 6.37
com.zeusln.zeus 3Lbz4vdt15Fsa4wVD3Yk8uGf6ugKKY4zSc 0.0006 5.62
de.schildbach.wallet bc1qedxd9jssgw2fferdmjyyh6fm8jax75q7drfnd4 0.00059521 5.57
com.zoffcc.applications.trifa 1TRifA7eNLHZEcCTj43eYVWHBbLqTuXkS 0.00028782 2.70
com.notecryptpro 1MHEbHt4sBeqGoriwAq1MsXZaZJinoUeLH 0.00027552 2.58
ir.hsn6.defendo 16D7Nroenpx4QDNqfq3Js7sdAVhew2NzGp 0.00018749 1.76
org.proninyaroslav.libretorrent 1Af9DgxtWvVp6bFiYQw2MeWtRzTXshRYpB 0.0001747 1.64
me.shrimadhavuk.numselapp 13csS5SByVR4e3tJ9c4gjC18Lua8dXDp9A 0.00010397 0.97
com.wesaphzt.privatelock 1GCkvAg9oG79niQTbh6EH9rPALQDXKyHKK 5.773e-05 0.54
com.wesaphzt.privatelocation 1GCkvAg9oG79niQTbh6EH9rPALQDXKyHKK 5.773e-05 0.54
ru.glesik.nostrangersms 1DbZjPqe4uaBv32deNqwbWUTrCempo2Wqk 5e-05 0.47
ru.ttyh.neko259.notey 1Lh7a1tx7EREENawQyHhiKoCRF6u6TzVrD 0.0 0.00
re.jcg.playmusicexporter 1NdzpDWPQ53xWT5fraGPZX5F9XrKiPBXjp 0.0 0.00
pl.sanszo.pcis 1PbH84rewi34Ffgr3C5NutMdvEzSQ13wUt 0.0 0.00 17E32x5ygXkqf5EWJkryZuarUDUFrb8UqQ 0.0 0.00 17E32x5ygXkqf5EWJkryZuarUDUFrb8UqQ 0.0 0.00
org.valos.isolmoa 1LbgYALbkQ2Trgh4yXqdBnbdQosGard5hd 0.0 0.00
org.thecongers.mtpms 1Pg54vVnaLxNsziA6cy9CTefoEG5iAm9Uh 0.0 0.00
org.pacien.tincapp 152t9TEBBhEescQx5gG7T5wHaJVeupAXQm 0.0 0.00
org.opengemara.shiurim 19p5TXDfMksHjUstFEp2PUt383Cy7JdmLa 0.0 0.00
org.nuntius35.wrongpinshutdown 1LSs1BR4ktQcW8DrCjrSrWUvBD6h2rqNJm 0.0 0.00
org.nick.wwwjdic 1DXhWFS9SL78GGyX7Luao9EuP5SxtDiPG1 0.0 0.00
org.miamplayer.autoairplanemode 39RBokXr4V9FPpuF7v1bM6PYcbgRRApp9W 0.0 0.00
org.mbach.lemonde 39RBokXr4V9FPpuF7v1bM6PYcbgRRApp9W 0.0 0.00 1588ArbHPcb5VtpZPQgue9iPZ9LiA1eEjF 0.0 0.00
org.kost.externalip 1KbtLnxp6mhkGznFNZZQdcaCUQHmrTtLm4 0.0 0.00
org.kaqui 12bnT7epKmf9ztkAeuM8dHCcoc76r9rgVX 0.0 0.00
org.emunix.unipatcher 16coztryz7xbNNDNhhf98wuHmi3hEintsW 0.0 0.00
org.emunix.insteadlauncher 16coztryz7xbNNDNhhf98wuHmi3hEintsW 0.0 0.00
org.chickenhook.startflagexploit bc1qvll2mp5ndwd4sgycu4ad2ken4clhjac7mdlcaj 0.0 0.00
org.androidpn.client 13MjTPDFQtxv1u1sWURkDduFSw97KbMfsS 0.0 0.00
org.amoradi.syncopoli 1DT8ijBkGUAvW9VZqfCQBJFS62vvw5E7QK 0.0 0.00
net.schueller.peertube 1LoTXo728HzYTtyfbkaf5ewSRvu8ABTDPm 0.0 0.00
net.mabako.steamgifts 1NQBKppWPZiE5PshLxqfFW4pgsnAv9irEu 0.0 0.00
name.gdr.acastus_photon 1NjjuTxXm3ezpnVUGk4VmdEZUcym3SKZ8z 0.0 0.00
me.dbarnett.acastus 1NjjuTxXm3ezpnVUGk4VmdEZUcym3SKZ8z 0.0 0.00
me.danielbarnett.addresstogps 1NjjuTxXm3ezpnVUGk4VmdEZUcym3SKZ8z 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.screenlock 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.minesweeper 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.chordshift 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.bustorino 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.andreascarpino.hostisdown 1Ph3hFEoQaD4PK6MhL3kBNNh9FZFBfisEH 0.0 0.00
is.zi.huewidgets 1FdGg777eP4cqMrJVMRQiMXEHE2Ee6F62T 0.0 0.00
ir.hsn6.tpb 12SL5VgtjozKTXMgpX7w4MjKvvcFAHbTks 0.0 0.00
ir.hsn6.k2 1iNMJMFqDgYp7iUMd4qkP79CiCLSwLPyp 0.0 0.00
io.github.tjg1.nori 1NHUsSzj3N7TE8rykUYk8rqqLWWSmTVzdp 0.0 0.00
in.shick.lockpatterngenerator 1JscvZEbchRUpCXYX13bJb3aF6U1yT9BwG 0.0 0.00
ga.testapp.testapp 3NUiJXDCkyRTb9Tg7n63yK6Y7CexADtSEh 0.0 0.00
fr.renzo.wikipoff 1BAaxTvK1jkoFKf7qWF2C6M4UX1y86MxaF 0.0 0.00
fr.cph.chicago.foss 13WUmCX1AePEKFGv5U1qRgBockFahsm21o 0.0 0.00
fr.corenting.traficparis 3JmaEkuviReVdCG8fjqCs5LwQkaEGcTMtZ 0.0 0.00
eth.matteljay.mastermindy 14VZcizduTvUTesw4T9yAHZ7GjDDmXZmVs 0.0 0.00
design.codeux.authpass.fdroid 3NcBacCmJbYWpwxj6rWzpM7sx48etMrPtc 0.0 0.00
de.yaacc 1MUvbfNgunNCUtitCkoEEMgmQGZJJg4isj 0.0 0.00
de.vanitasvitae.enigmandroid 1EqhcKs1pZJhEmyCtbH3qtkHT3Y48MCoAT 0.0 0.00
de.schildbach.wallet_test bc1qglkj2svuu3xsktup5xla8u2wjzlu8mfzk6509r 0.0 0.00
de.naturalnet.zahnarztgeraeusche 1EAytSwn1u7tKTZ9sMDVCzDqe2nwVf4Pra 0.0 0.00
de.naturalnet.mirwtfapp 1EAytSwn1u7tKTZ9sMDVCzDqe2nwVf4Pra 0.0 0.00
de.k4ever.k4android 1KiwFPGCunGXF53DBTBf32cNTPXq9FbX5H 0.0 0.00
de.jkliemann.parkendd 1HBFDdz7dJeBE2c3zQmWnzeWCbHoZQ64dd 0.0 0.00
de.Cherubin7th.blackscreenpresentationremote 18QSJmV6Liia7Cau65JnEj2JyxEUCGE2oz 0.0 0.00
com.tritop.androsense2 1Dj4Xkz5KtsarmioEKuuZCBVjahr14dih4 0.0 0.00
com.toxtox.philosopherstonewidget 1KvYjRx1VozqUpiYSCMrEL6mo9LvmpCcNN 0.0 0.00
com.sanskritbasics.memory bc1q3xasvfn2c84dprkk2mxj5g7n6ujwylphu8qsf3 0.0 0.00
com.rockbyte.arxiv 1jokQaTneW1KCbCWsMdVtvPv6oSJ1H3tF 0.0 0.00
com.rigid.birthdroid 1BLEeqwXnJJbpaLHiskZ5WyJJRyEWqCAQZ 0.0 0.00 bc1qlkzlcsvvtn3y6mek5umv5tc4ln09l64x6y42hr 0.0 0.00
com.onetwofivegames.kungfoobarracuda 1MVNsgRmLqgMoEoQu918ozFFiTaepF8Ti5 0.0 0.00
com.mdroid 18BqyV9mNbFLi5HNNnfUprnPJyJDFP59Xh 0.0 0.00
com.mareksebera.simpledilbert 1FpGN3kcZ3GQsaJgBa8rxGRJjBjJavu78g 0.0 0.00
com.marceljurtz.lifecounter 1HDdKd3uoxdvS8pBKKKxEkjoJqUuBiEjkL 0.0 0.00
com.llamacorp.equate 15KCzAPJvSJLUfjuTQgAgSiSwQu6uLiexC 0.0 0.00 1CYiRF6AncdNkxcWTRFf5Mxi7UaFhC3jFG 0.0 0.00
com.ideasfrombrain.search_based_launcher_v2 1NapZs8brWNifGk7QFemqTByczdBAAg9cA 0.0 0.00 bc1qs50wst8x53ud5lr80wukhjcy6l7zpxf5mz5rtm 0.0 0.00
com.github.igrmk.smsq 32JdGEVP42WiVxsADa3Z65qn1xe2K7Yg3S 0.0 0.00
com.genonbeta.TrebleShot 1DBsq8aZjn54hnDYsRY7pTLb3HfsE1mSv8 0.0 0.00
com.example.root.analyticaltranslator 15WVb3LZWCsdZGjkNFBuELwt3U4zpnSgwa 0.0 0.00
com.emmanuelmess.simpleaccounting 1HFhPxH9bqMKvs44nHqXjEEPC2m7z1V8tW 0.0 0.00
com.easwareapps.marbleone_ad_free 1PNwD199whFao1rjMX82Zi5A7M5B6KB7be 0.0 0.00
com.easwareapps.g2l 1PNwD199whFao1rjMX82Zi5A7M5B6KB7be 0.0 0.00
com.easwareapps.f2lflap2lock_adfree 1PNwD199whFao1rjMX82Zi5A7M5B6KB7be 0.0 0.00
com.danhasting.radar 1EwgjPGYiChJ5vyBndt9ugzd963FiVc6gj 0.0 0.00
com.atop 15G2T13emQnJRMvA74Zr6Q71bBcaYBn71v 0.0 0.00
com.aptasystems.dicewarepasswordgenerator 1PbHGv88KH6SXw6d66uSFTUzW2aeqxvQ7V 0.0 0.00
com.andreasgift.totalzero 1Q9TinY9kWoNMWuiToHiGC9uxCk6Vd41Gb 0.0 0.00
com.anddevw.getchromium 188RxvRnSXSZZnjuDdLwNirHDfNusVPobh 0.0 0.00
at.tacticaldevc.panictrigger 1EVr5tm2kugffNy3RWPGFoug6X9v3GTxuJ 0.0 0.00
im.vector.riotx 1LxowEgsquZ3UPZ68wHf8v2MDZw82dVmAEa -1.0 -9366.36 1LxowEgsquZ3UPZ68wHf8v2MDZw82dVmAEa -1.0 -9366.36
I know this is flawed, I found it interesting nonetheless
The post which inspired this:
submitted by prcrst to fossdroid [link] [comments]

The White Dragon : A Canadian Dragon Portfolio

Alright guys, Ive been working on this for a while and a post on here by a guy describing his portfolio here was the final kick in the ass for me to put this together. I started writing this to summarize what Im doing for my friends who are beginners, and also for me to make some sense of it for myself
Hopefully parts of it are useful to you, and also ideally you guys can point out errors or have a suggestion or two. I'm posting this here as opposed to investing or canadianinvestor (blech) because they're just gonna tell me to buy an index fund.
This first section is a preamble describing the Canadian tax situation and why Im doing things the way that I am. Feel free to skip it if you dont care about that. Also, there might be mistake regarding what the laws are here so dont take my word for it and verify it for yourself please.
So here in Canada we have two types of registered accounts (theres actually more but whatver). There is the TFSA "Tax Free Savings Account", and RRSP "Registered Retirement Savings Account"
For the sake of simplicity, from the time you turn 18 you are allowed to deposit 5k (it changes year to year based on inflation etc)in each of them. That "room" accumulates retroactively, so if you haventdone anything and are starting today and you are 30 you have around 60k you can put in each of them. The prevailing wisdom is that you should max out the TFSA first and you'll see why in a minute.

TFSA is post tax deposits, with no capital gains or other taxes applied to selling your securities, dividends or anything else. You can withdraw your gains at any time, and the amount that you withdraw is added to the "room" you have for the next year. So lets say I maxed out my TFSA contributions and I take out 20k today, on January of next year I can put back in 20k plus the 5 or whatever they allow for that year. You can see how powerful this is. Theres a few limitations on what is eligable to be held in the TFSA such as bitcoin/bitcoin ETFs, overseas stocks that arent listed on NYSE, TSX, london and a few others. You can Buy to Open and Sell to Close call and put options as well as write Covered Calls.

The RRSP is pre-tax deposits and is a tax deferred scheme. You deposit to lower your income tax burden (and hopefully drop below a bracket) but once you retire you will be taxed on anything you pull out. Withdrawing early has huge penalties and isnt recommended. You are however allowed to borrow against it for a down payment as a first time home buyer. The strategy with these is that a youngperson entering the workforce is likely to be in a fairly low tax bracket and (hopefully) earns more money as they get older and more skilled so the RRSP has more value the greater your pre-taxincome is. You can also do this Self Directed. Its not relevant to this strategy but I included it for the sake of context.
Non registered accounts ( or any other situation, such as selling commercial real estate etc) is subject to a capital gains tax. In so far as I understand it, you add all your gains and losses up at the end of the year. If its a positive number, you cut that number IN HALF and add it to your regular pre-tax income. So if I made 60k from the dayjob and 20k on my margin account that adds up to 70k that I get taxed on. if its a loss, you carry that forward into the next year. Theres no distinction between long term and short term. Also physical PMs are treated differently and I'll fill that part in later once I have the details down.
The reason why all that babble is important is that my broker Questrade, which isnt as good as IB (the only real other option up here as far as Im aware) has one amazing feature that no other broker has: "Margin Power"
If you have a TFSA and a Margin account with them, you can link them together and have your securities in the TFSA collateralise your Margin account. Essentially, when it comes to the Maintenance Excess of the Margin Account QT doesnt care if its in the TFSA *or* the Margin!
You can see how powerful this is.
So as you can tell by the title, a lot of this is heavily inspired by Chris Cole's paper "The Allegory of the Hawk and the Serpent". You can read it here:
Between it, his interviews and my mediocre options skills at the time my mind was blown. Unfortunately I didnt know how to do the Long Volatility part until after the crash in March but I've since then had nothing but time to scour the internet and learn as much as I could.
The way I interpret this isnt necessarily "what you should have right now", but what abstracted model they were able to backtest that gave them the best performance over the 90 years. Also, a lot of my portfolio I already had before I started trying to build this.
As such my allocations dont match the proportions he gave. Not saying my allocations are better, just showing where they are at this time.
I'm going to describe how I do Long Volatility at the end rather than the beginning since the way *I* do it wont make sense until you see the rest of the portflio.

Physical PMs 22%
I'm not sure wether he intended this to be straight up physical gold or include miners and royalty streaming companies so I will just keep this as physical.
I consider Silver to be a non-expiring call option on gold, so that can live here too. I am actually *very* overweight silver and my strategy is to convert a large portion of it to gold (mostly my bars) to gold as the ratio tightens up.
If youre into crypto, you can arguably say that has a place in this section.
If an ETF makes sense for part of your portfolio, I suggest the Sprott ones such as PHYS. Sprott is an honest business and they actually have the metal they say they have. If you have enough, you can redeem your shares from the Royal Canadian Mint. The only downside is that they dont have an options chain, so you cant sell covered calls etc. Simple enough I suppose.
One thing to bear in mind, there is a double edged sword with this class of assets. They're out of the system, theyre nobody's business but your own and theres no counter party. That unfortunately means that you cant lever against it for margin or sell covered calls etc. You can still buy puts though (more on that later)

Commodity Trend (CTA) 10%
Patrick Ceresna gave a good presentation on what this strategy is. Until I watched this video I just thought it meant "buy commodities". A real CTA does this with futures also so aside from the way he showed, there are two other ETFs that are worth looking at.
COM - This is an explicit trend following ETF that follows a LONG/FLAT strategy instead of LONG/SHORT on a pile of commodity futures. So if they get a "sell" signal for oil or soybeans they sell what they have and go to cash.
COMT- Holds an assortment of different month futures in different commodities, as well as a *lot* of various related shares in producers. Its almost a one stop shop commodities portfolio. Pays a respectable dividend in December
If you want to break the "rules" of CTA, and include equities theres a few others that are also worth looking at
KOL- This is a coal ETF. The problems with it are that a lot of the holdings dont have much to do with coal. One of them is a tractor company. A lot of the companies are Chinese so theres a bit of a red flag.
Obviously Thermal Coal, the kind used for heating and powerplants isnt in vogue and wont be moving forward...but coking coal is used for steel manufacturing and that ain't going anywhere. The dividend is huge, pays out in December. A very very small position might be worth the risk.
Uranium- I'm in URA because thats the only way for me to get exposure to Kazatoprom (#1 producer), which is 20% of the holdings. The other 20% is Cameco (#2 producer)and then its random stuff.
Other than that I have shares in Denison which seems like its a good business with some interesting projects underway. I'm still studying the uranium space so I dont really have much to say about it of any value.
RSX- Russia large caps. If you dont want to pick between the myriad of undervalued, high dividend paying commodity companies that Russia has then just grab this. It only pays in December but it has a liquid options chain so you can do Covered Calls in the meantime if you want.
NTR- Nutrien, canadian company that was formed when two others merged. They are now the worlds largest potash producer. Pretty good dividend. They have some financial difficulties and the stocks been in a downtrend forever. I feel its a good candidate to watch or sell some puts on.
I'm trying to come up with a way to play agriculture since this new phase we're going to be entering is likely to cause huge food shortages.

EURN and NAT- I got in fairly early on the Tanker hype before it was even hype as a way to short oil but I got greedy and lost a lot of my gains. I pared down my position and I'm staying for the dividend.
If you get an oil sell signal, this might be a way to play that still.

Fixed Income/Bonds 10%

Now, I am not a bond expert but unless youre doing some wacky spreads with futures or whatever... I dont see much reason to buy government debt any more. If you are, youre basically betting that they take rates negative. Raoul Pal of Real Vision is pretty firm in his conviction that this will happen. I know better than to argue with him but I dont see risk/reward as being of much value.
HOWEVER, I found two interesting ETFs that seem to bring something to this portfolio
IVOL- This is run by Nancy Davis, and is comprised of TIPS bonds which are nominally inflation protected (doubt its real inflation but whatever) overlayed with some OTC options that are designed to pay off big if the Fed loses control of the long end of the yield curve, which is what might happen during a real inflation situation. Pays out a decent yield monthly
TAIL- This is a simpler portfolio of 10yr treasuries with ladder of puts on the SPX. Pays quarterly.

Equities 58% (shared with options/volatility below)
This is where it gets interesting, obviously most of this is in mining shares but before I get to those I found some interesting stuff that I'm intending to build up as I pare down my miners when the time comes to start doing that.
VIRT- I cant remember where I saw this, but people were talking about this as a volatility play. Its not perfect, but look at the chart compared to SPY. Its a HFT/market making operation, the wackier things get the more pennies they can scalp. A 4% dividend isnt shabby either.
FUND- This is an interesting closed end fund run by Whitney George, one of the principals at Sprott. He took it with him when he joined the company. Ive read his reports and interviews and I really like his approach to value and investing. He's kind of like if Warren Buffett was a gold bug. Theres 120 holdings in there, mostly small caps and very diverse...chicken factories, ball bearings all kinds of boring ass shit that nobody knows exists. Whats crucial is that most of it "needs to exist". Between him, his family and other people at Sprott they control 40% or so of the shares, so they definitely have skin in the game. Generous dividend.
ZIG- This is a "deep value" strategy fund, run by Tobias Carlisle. He has a fairly simple valuation formula called the Acquirer's Multiple that when he backtested it, is supposed to perform very well. He did an interview with Chris Cole on real Vision where he discusses how Value and Deep Value havent done well recently, but over the last 100 years have proven to be very viable strategies. If we feel that theres a new cycle brewing, then this strategy may work again moving forward.

I want to pause and point out something here, Chris Cole, Nassim Taleb and the guys at Mutiny Fund spend a lot of effort explaining that building a portfolio is a lot like putting together a good basketall team. They need to work together, and pick up each others slack
A lot of the ETFs I'm listing here are in many ways portfolios in and of themselves and are *actively managed*. I specifically chose them because they follow a methodology that I respect but I can't do myself because I dont have the skill, temperament or access to.
The next one is a hidden gem and ties into this. I'm not sure how much more upside there is in this one but man was I surprised.
SII- Sprott Inc. I *never* see people listing this stock in their PMs portfolios. A newsletter I'm subscribed to described this stock as the safest way to play junior miners. Their industry presence, intellectual capital and connections means that they get *the best* private placement deals in the best opportunities. I cant compete with a staff like theirs and I'm not going to try. I bought this at 2.50, and I liked the dividend. Since then they did a reverse split to get on the NYSE and like the day after the stock soared.
When it comes to mining ETFS I like GOAU and SILJ the best. None of their major holdings are dead weight companies that are only there because of market cap. I dont want Barrick in my portfolio etc.
SGDJ is a neat version of GDXJ.
Aside from that my individual miners/royalty companies are (no particular order)
RIO- Rio2 on the tsx, not rio tinto
Options/Volatility: varies
So this is where we get to the part about options, Volatility and how I do it. I started out in the options space with The Wheel strategy and the Tastytrade approach of selling premium. The spreads and puts I sell, are on shares listed above, in fact some of those I dont hold anymore.
Theres tons of stuff on this in thetagang and options so I wont go into a whole bunch (and you shouldnt be learning the mechanics from me anyway) but theres one thing I want to go over before it gets wild.
If I sell a Cash Secured Put, from a risk management perspective its identical to just buying 100 shares of the underlying security. You are equally "Short Vol" as well, it just that with options
its a little more explicit with the Greeks and everything. But if I use my margin that I was talking about earlier, then I can still collect the premium and the interest doesnt kick in unless Im actually assigned the shares.
But if I sell too many puts on KL or AG, and something happens where the miners get cut down (and lets be real, they all move together) my margin goes down and then I get assigned and account gets blown up
So what I need to do, is balance out the huge Short Vol situation in my portfolio, be net Long Vol and directly hedge my positions. Since the overwhelming majority of my equities are all tied to bullion this is actually a very easy thing to do.


So I set this up so the vast majority of my margin is tied up in these 1-2 or even 1-3 ratio put spreads that *I actually put on for a small credit*, and roll them every once in a while. I run them on SLV, and GDX.
I keep enough room on my margin so I can withstand a 10% drawdown before it sets off the long end of the spreads and then I can ride it out until it turns around and we keep the PM bull market going.
Theres another cool spread I've been using, which is a modified Jade Lizard; if already hold shares, I'll sell a put, sell a covered call, and use some of the premium to buy a longer dated call. Ive been running this on AG mostly.
I have a few more spreads I can show you but Im tired now so it'll have to wait for later.
As I said multiple times, I do intend to trim these miners later but now isnt the time for that IMO. I'm also monitoring this almost full time since I have an injury and have nothing better to do until I heal :p
submitted by ChudBuntsman to pmstocks [link] [comments]

[OC] If the regular season ended today, who would make your All-NBA 1st team? And 2nd team? And 3rd team? And 4th team? And 5th team? And 6th team? And 7th -- uh oh -- I think I lost my marbles... but let's keep going... 8th team? 9th team? 10th team?

Getting named as an NBA All-Star is a high honor, but being named to an All-NBA team is even rarer air. After all, only 15 players in the entire league earn that distinction. The fact that it's such an exclusive club makes it so important, so the idea of adding more players to the list would devalue it by nature. It'd be a silly, fruitless exercise, and a complete waste of time.
That said... it sure beats "reality" right now. And in the interest of escapism, let's entertain that hypothetical. Who would make your 1st team All-NBA? Your 2nd? Your 3rd? Your 4th? The challenge is get all the way up to the 10th if you can handle that test of your sanity.
For my own, I include a few caveats:
--- The NBA breaks down All-NBA spots more traditionally with frontcourt and backcourt, but I find that outdated. For mine, I'm going to include 1 "lead guard," 2 "wings," 1 "big," and 1 "flex" that can be any position. To me, that's reflective of the modern game. Most teams play with 1 guard, 3 wings, and 1 big, but there are teams that use 2 lead guards, or 2 bigs, etc.
--- The nature of basketball statistics tends to break down by game, or by minute, or even by play/possession. In the process, we tend to overlook players who are durable and add aggravate value over the course of a season. Personally, I'm going to factor in "games played" more than most would.
--- The advanced stats I'm listing are true shooting percentage and ESPN's estimated "wins added" based on their real plus/minus metric.
With all that said, let's get to the madness.
1st TEAM
GUARD: James Harden (HOU). 34.4 points, 7.4 assists, 62 TS%, +10.4 wins added
You can tell when a player has reached an historic level of greatness when no one seems to care when they're averaging over 34 points per game (on awesome efficiency.) Ho hum.
WING: LeBron James (LAL). 25.7 points, 10.6 assists, 58 TS%, +11.0 wins added
After last year's disappointment, LeBron James has come back leaner and meaner, with much better effort on D. He hasn't been attacking the paint and drawing fouls quite as well as he did in his youth, but he's adjusted his playing style and racked up a career high in assists.
WING: Giannis Antetounkmpo (MIL). 29.6 points, 13.7 rebounds, 61 TS%, +11.2 wins added
The Greek Freak's struggles at the free throw line (down to 63%) have lowered his efficiency from last year, but he's still clearly in contention for another MVP season. His point total nearly matches his minutes (30.9).
BIG: Nikola Jokic (DEN). 20.2 points, 6.9 assists, 60 TS%, +6.0 wins added
The Joker LOOKS like he should be a complete liability on defense, but the stats haven't born that out (he's +1.8 on that end in RPM.) And given that, his transcendent passing ability assists (get it???) his 1st team candidacy.
FLEX: Anthony Davis (LAL). 26.7 points, 2.4 blocks, 61 TS%, +5.2 wins added
The Lakers have vaulted into the top 3 in defense, largely due to Anthony Davis' ability to wreak havoc on that end. And keep in mind, he's leading his team in PPG as well.
2nd TEAM
GUARD: Damian Lillard (POR). 28.9 points, 7.8 assists, 62 TS%, +4.9 wins added
If it wasn't for Steph Curry and James Harden, Dame would be looking at a lot more first-team All-NBA seasons. This hasn't been Portland's best by any stretch, but it's hard to fault him for that.
WING: Luka Doncic (DAL). 28.7 points, 8.7 assists, 58 TS%, +5.9 wins added
No doubt, Luka Doncic is our toughest exclusion from the 1st team and the one I figure will be the most unpopular pick (so far.) The reason he slipped off the 1st team for me is the injury; he's played 10 less games than Nikola Jokic.
WING: Kawhi Leonard (LAC). 26.9 points, 5.0 assists, 59 TS%, +5.7 wins added
Similarly, it's always going to be tough for me to justify Kawhi on a 1st team as long as he takes off games (he's missed 13/64 so far.) Still, he should be rested and ready to go for another title campaign.
BIG: Rudy Gobert (UTA). 15.1 points, 13.7 rebounds, 70 TS%, +4.5 wins added
I wonder if Rudy Gobert's coronavirus issues will hurt him in media votes in the future. Personally, I'm just going to keep rewarding him and recognizing him as one of the most impactful players in the league.
FLEX: Jimmy Butler (MIA). 20.2 points, 6.1 assists, 58 TS%, +4.1 wins added
Jimmy Butler's struggled to score from the field this year, but his ability to draw contact and get to the line (9.1 FTA) keeps his efficiency above average. And therein, his passing and defense help boost him into this range.
3rd TEAM
GUARD: Chris Paul (OKC). 17.7 points, 6.8 assists, 61 TS%, +5.5 wins added
An incredible year all around for CP3, who has turned 35 years old this month.
WING: Jayson Tatum (BOS). 23.6 points, 7.1 rebounds, 56 TS%, +4.6 wins added
We all know him as a deadly scorer, but Jayson Tatum's added strength has helped him hang at the 4 spot on defense, which is a boon for the Celtics' small-ball/wing-ball approach.
WING: Khris Middleton (MIL). 21.1 points, 6.2 rebounds, 62 TS%, +3.7 wins added
Giannis is the engine that drives the Bucks, but having shooters like Middleton around him is key.
BIG: Pascal Siakam (TOR). 23.6 points, 3.6 assists, 56 TS%, +4.8 wins added
Without Kawhi Leonard soaking up attention, Pascal Siakam's not getting as many easy baskets (his 2-point FG% has dropped from 60.2% to 50.6%.) Still, he's a hugely valuable player on both ends of the floor. Is he a true “big?” No. But I think that term is broad enough to extend past centers and can include PFs as well for our purposes.
FLEX: Russell Westbrook (HOU). 27.5 points, 8.0 rebounds, 54 TS%, +6.0 wins added
I've never been a big Westbrook fan, but I give him credit for keeping his activity level and productivity up in a new role. He's gotten better and better as the season has gone on as well.
4th TEAM
GUARD: Ben Simmons (PHI). 16.7 points, 8.2 assists, 61 TS%, +4.2 wins added
Shooting? Still a problem. But fortunately, Ben Simmons does virtually everything else well. He can also step up his game when needed (like when Embiid is out.)
WING: Donovan Mitchell (UTA). 24.2 points, 4.2 assists, 56 TS%, +2.1 wins added
I don't know if Donovan Mitchell is truly any better than any high-scoring SGs like Devin Booker or Zach LaVine, but we have to reward him from being on a winner.
WING: Brandon Ingram (NO). 24.3 points, 6.3 rebounds, 59 TS%, +2.4 wins added
A candidate for Most Improved, Brandon Ingram helped carry his team early in the season. He'll still have to figure out his chemistry with Zion Williamson, but it's safe to say he made himself a lot of money this year.
BIG: Bam Adebayo (MIA). 16.2 points, 10.5 rebounds, 61 TS%, +3.1 wins added
Bam's ability to move the ball on offense (5+ assists) and move his feet on defense is key to the team. The scary part is: he may have another level to his game to reach.
FLEX: Devin Booker (PHX). 26.1 points, 6.6 assists, 62 TS%, +3.5 wins added
It's getting hard to blame Devin Booker for Phoenix's W-L record. He's just a flat-out stud scorer.
5th TEAM
GUARD: Trae Young (ATL). 29.6 points, 9.3 assists, 60 TS%, +3.2 wins added
Like Devin Booker, Trae Young is an offensive savant. Unfortunately, his defense is even more of an issue. He graded at -3.1 in RPM on that end, one of the worst in the entire NBA.
WING: Bradley Beal (WAS). 30.5 points, 6.1 assists, 58 TS%, +1.8 wins added
You expect Trae Young to be bad at defense, but Bradley Beal has graded surprisingly bad there as well (-2.8 RPM.) Of course, starting alongside Isaiah Thomas doesn't make that easy. Nevertheless, we had to downgrade him a few spots for the inconsistent effort there.
WING: Jaylen Brown (BOS). 20.4 points, 6.4 rebounds, 59 TS%, +3.3 wins added
Coming out of Cal, some scouts questions Jaylen Brown's feel for the game. Right now, it's hard to find many things that he doesn't do well.
BIG: Joel Embiid (PHI). 23.4 points, 11.8 rebounds, 59 TS%, +2.8 wins added
Embiid would rank higher at full strength, but he's missed about 1/3 of the season so far.
FLEX: Kyle Lowry (TOR). 19.7 points, 7.7 assists, 59 TS%, +3.2 wins added
Now age 34, Kyle Lowry continues to play very well on both ends. He's the little engine that could -- or perhaps more appropriately, the caboose.
6th TEAM
GUARD: Eric Bledsoe (MIL). 15.4 points, 5.4 assists, 58 TS%, +2.9 wins added
Eric Bledsoe gets more flak than credit, but he's still one of the best players on the best team in the league.
WING: Zach LaVine (CHI). 25.5 points, 4.2 assists, 57 TS%, +4.3 wins added
If the Bulls had a better record, Zach LaVine could have been a few spots higher. His defense isn't quite as bad as advertised either.
WING: C.J. McCollum (POR). 22.5 points, 4.3 assists, 54 TS%, +3.7 wins added
This must be the "all flak" team, because C.J. McCollum also gets blamed a lot for Portland's struggles to get over the hump. To me, Dame+CJ isn't the problem; the complete mess at the SF-PF position is to blame.
BIG: Domatas Sabonis (IND). 18.5 points, 12.4 rebounds, 59 TS%, +1.5 wins added
Arvydas' kid also has some baby Joker to his game, as his 5.0 assists are a huge part of Indiana's offense.
FLEX: Paul George (LAC). 21.0 points, 3.9 assists, 58 TS%, +2.5 wins added
Again, I'm factoring in games played more than most, and Paul George (42 GP) has missed quite a bit of time.
7th TEAM
GUARD: Kemba Walker (BOS). 21.2 points, 4.9 assists, 57 TS%, +2.5 wins added
Kemba Walker doesn't have the same workload in Boston as he did in Charlotte, and the stats reflect that. Still, he's safely one of the top 10 PGs in the league.
WING: Bojan Bogdanovic (UTA). 20.2 points, 4.1 rebounds, 60 TS%, +2.6 wins added
Here we're talking BOJAN (from Utah) and not BOGDAN (from Sacramento), although they're both good. Bogey's delivered on the three-point shooting for Utah, hitting 41.4% on 7+ attempts a game.
WING: Danilo Gallinari (OKC). 19.2 points, 5.5 rebounds, 61 TS%, +2.8 wins added
Perpetually underrated, it may be time we stop acting shocked when Gallo's teams (LAC last year, OKC this year) are better than people expect.
BIG: Karl-Anthony Towns (MIN). 26.5 points, 10.8 rebounds, 64 TS%, +2.7 wins added
KAT was among the hardest to rank for me. Offensively, he's historically great -- arguably the best shooting center of all time. The defense is an issue, of course, and the workload is what doomed him on my list. His 35 games played is our lowest total so far.
FLEX: Jrue Holiday (NO). 19.6 points, 6.9 assists, 54 TS%, +3.5 wins added
It's fitting that Jrue Holiday is listed at "flex," because he's gone from a pure point guard to a jack of all trades.
8th TEAM
GUARD: Ja Morant (MEM). 17.6 points, 6.9 assists, 57 TS%, +1.6 wins added
As the lead guard of a team, you expect Ja Morant to put up good raw stats. However, his efficiency and steadiness is remarkable for a rookie making the leap from Murray State. He also gets a boost for leading Memphis into playoff position (for now, until the NBA decides to snatch that away.)
WING: Evan Fournier (ORL). 18.8 points, 3.2 assists, 60 TS%, +2.1 wins added
Quietly, Evan Fournier is having a good season for Orlando. If you don't believe me, google it.
WING: Robert Covington (HOU). 12.8 points, 1.5 steals, 57 TS%, +2.8 wins added
Every team would love to have a low-usage 3+D forward like RoCo. Except for Philly and Minnesota, I guess.
BIG: Hassan Whiteside (POR). 16.3 points, 14.2 rebounds, 64 TS%, +2.1 wins added
This may be a controversial pick because Whiteside has become a punching bag for fans, but he may have made the rare transition from underrated to overrated (and overpaid) and back to underrated again.
FLEX: Tobias Harris (PHI). 19.4 points, 6.8 rebounds, 56 TS%, +2.1 wins added
Speaking of overpaid... Tobias Harris hasn't lived up to his giant contract yet, but he's undoubtedly a good starter to have on your team.
9th TEAM
GUARD: Spencer Dinwiddie (TOR). 20.6 points, 6.8 assists, 54 TS%, +3.0 wins added
Nothing raises your bitcoin valuation more than that sweet, sweet All-NBA 9th team trophy.
WING: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (OKC). 19.3 points, 6.1 rebounds, 57 TS%, +2.1 wins added
Like Jrue Holiday, SGA is a point who can play "up" a position. In fact, he’s been working effectively at both SG and SF this year, as illustrated by that nice rebounding rate.
WING: Duncan Robinson (MIA). 13.3 points, 3.3 rebounds, 68 TS%, +3.0 wins added
This may be high for a one-trick pony, but that trick happens to be quite a valuable one. The unknown Robinson is hitting 44.8% of his threes (at 8.4 attempts per game.) He's a huge part of Miami's offensive gameplan.
BIG: Kristaps Porzingis (DAL). 19.2 points, 9.5 rebounds, 54 TS%, +3.9 wins added
Too high? Too low? I can't figure out Porzingis' season in Dallas so far. Still, any big who can block shots and hit threes has an inherent value.
FLEX: Dennis Schroder (OKC). 19.0 points, 4.1 assists, 57 TS%, +5.4 wins added
Perhaps the biggest surprise to OKC's success this season has been a career year for Dennis Schroder off the bench. He's even played well when paired with CP3 and SGA in the same lineup. The stats suggest that Schroder should rank even higher than this, but I'm still trying to wrap my mind around him becoming such an efficient player all of a sudden.
10th TEAM
GUARD: Lou Williams (LAC). 18.7 points, 5.7 assists, 55 TS%, +3.6 wins added
Sweet Lou has a little less to do now that Kawhi Leonard and Paul George are in town, but he's still one of the best scorers off the bench.
WING: Buddy Hield (SAC). 19.8 points, 4.8 rebounds, 57 TS%, +3.0 wins added
A NEW addition to the "scorer off the bench club," Buddy Hield deserves kudos for accepting that role as the Kings try to find a spark. He hasn't been as red-hot as he had been last season, but he's still one of the best SGs in the league.
WING: Gordon Hayward (BOS). 17.3 points, 4.1 assists, 59 TS%, +1.9 wins added
Gordon Hayward has quietly been working his way back into top form, with his ball movement and BBIQ two real feathers in his cap. He's dinged a few spots here based on missed time (he's only played 45 games.)
BIG: Montrezl Harrell (LAC). 18.6 points, 7.1 rebounds, 61 TS%, +3.6 wins added
Fittingly, Montrezl Harrell will join Lou Williams' team here. It'll be interesting to see whether Doc Rivers rolls with the two of them in crunch time during the playoffs.
FLEX: Nikola Vucevic (ORL): 19.5 points, 11.0 rebounds, 54 TS%, +2.0 wins added
It's debatable how valuable Vucevic's 20-10 seasons are because he's not a good defender and he's not a terribly efficient scorer. That said, I'm giving him credit for a high degree of difficulty here as the go-to scorer on a team that doesn't have a lot of weapons offensively.
just missed the cut
If you'd like to sub in any other players, here are some notable names:
PG FredVanVleet (TOR), PG Devonte' Graham (CHA), PG Malcolm Brogdon (IND), PG Jamal Murray, PG Lonzo Ball, PG De'Aaron Fox (SAC), PG/SG Marcus Smart (BOS), PG/SG Kendrick Nunn (MIA), SF Joe Ingles (UTA), SF Will Barton (DEN), SF DeMar DeRozan (SA), SF/PF Davis Bertans (WAS), SF/PF Aaron Gordon (ORL), PF LaMarcus Aldridge (SA), C Myles Turner (IND), C Steven Adams (OKC), C Andre Drummond (CLE), C Jarrett Allen (BKN), C Derrick Favors (NO), C Jonas Valanciunas (MEM), C Brook Lopez (MIL). And of course, we need an obligatory Zion Williamson (NO) mention, although his 19 games played is a tough hurdle to overcome.
submitted by ZandrickEllison to nba [link] [comments] accidentally publishes on-chain proof that they fake BCHs adoption metrics. Post to r/btc gets deleted and OP is now permanently banned.

Everybody who has posted this on btc has been banned according to modlog. Total of 9 users so far. Don't post this on btc or you will get banned. If you get banned comment on this thread or PM me.

May 2020:

According to btc modlogs, mc-78 has been banned because he questioned the April report with this comment.

According to btc modlogs, BCH4TW has been banned because he questioned the April report with this comment.

March 2020:

According to btc modlogs, bch4god has been banned because he questioned the February report with this comment.

According to btc modlogs, ISeeGregPeople has been banned because he linked to this thread in his comment.

February 2020:

According to btc modlogs, whene-is-satoshi has been banned because he linked to this thread in his comment.

January 2020:

According to btc modlogs, cryptokittykiller's post has been removed for linking to this thread.

According to btc modlogs, bashcalf has now been banned for linking to this thread.

According to btc modlogs, EnterLayer2 has now been banned for this post pointing out that this thread has reached 1000 upvotes.

This article was posted by bitcoinsatellite on btc here. Once it reached frontpage it got deleted and OP was banned from btc and bitcoincash as a result.

Disclaimer: I am not and have never been affiliated with any of the mentioned parties in a private or professional matter.
Presumably in an attempt to smear a local competitor, Hayden Otto inadvertently publishes irrefutable on-chain proof that he excluded non-BCH retail revenue to shape the "BCH #1 in Australia" narrative.
  • Scroll down to "Proof of exclusion" if you are tired of the drama recap.
  • Scroll down to "TLDR" if you want a summary.


In September 2019, started publishing so called monthly "reports" about crypto retail payments in Australia. They claimed that ~90% of Australia's crypto retail revenue is processed via their own HULA system and that ~92% of all crypto retail revenue happens in BCH.
They are aggregating two data sources to come up with this claim.
One is TravelByBit (TBB) who publishes their PoS transactions (BTC, LN, ETH, BNB, DASH, BCH) live on a ticker.
The other source is HULA, a newly introduced POS system (BCH only) and direct competitor to TBB run by - the same company who created the report. Despite being on-chain their transactions are private, not published and not verifiable by third parties outside
Two things stood out in the "reports", noted by multiple users (including vocal BCH proponents):
  • The non-BCH parts must have tx excluded and the report neglects to mention it (the total in their TBB analysis does not match what is reported on the TBB website.)
  • The BCH part has outliers included (e.g. BCH city conference in September with 35x the daily average)
The TBB website loads the historic tx data in the browser but hides transactions older than 7 days from being displayed, i.e. you can access more than 7 days worth of data if you understand JavaScript and can read the source code (source).

Hayden Otto's reaction

In direct response to me publishing these findings on btc, Hayden Otto - an employee at and the author of the report who also happens to be a moderator of /BitcoinCash - banned me immediately from said sub (source).
In subsequent discussion (which repeated for every monthly "report" which was flawed in the same ways as described above), Hayden responded using the same tactics:
"No data was removed"
"The guy is straight out lying. There is guaranteed no missing tx as the data was collected directly from the source." (source)
"Only data I considered non-retail was removed"
"I also had these data points and went through them to remove non-retail transactions, on both TravelbyBit and HULA." (source)
He admits to have removed non-BCH tx by "Game Ranger" because he considers them non-retail (source). He also implies they might be involved in money laundering and that TBB might fail their AML obligations in processing Game Ranger's transactions (source).
The report does not mention any data being excluded at all and he still fails to explain why several businesses that are clearly retail (e.g. restaurants, cafes, markets) had tx excluded (source).
"You are too late to prove I altered the data"
"[...] I recorded [the data] manually from over the month of September. The website only shows transactions from the last 7 days and then they disappear. No way for anyone to access stats beyond that." (source)
Fortunately you can, if you can read the website's source code. But you need to know a bit of JavaScript to verify it yourself, so not an ideal method to easily prove the claim of data exclusion to the public. But it laters turns out Hayden himself has found an easier way to achieve the same.
"The report can't be wrong because it has been audited."
In response to criticism about the flawed methodology in generating the September report, hired an accountant from a regional Bitcoin BCH startup to "audit" the October report. This is remarkable, because not only did their reported TBB totals still not match those from the TBB site - their result was mathematically impossible. How so? No subset of TBB transaction in that month sums up to the total they reported. So even if they excluded retail transactions at will, they still must have messed up the sum (source). Why didn't their auditor notice their mistake? She said she "conducted a review based on the TravelByBit data provided to her", i.e. the data acquisition and selection process was explicitly excluded from the audit (source).
"You are a 'pathetic liar', a 'desperate toll', an 'astroturf account' and 'a total dumb ass' and are 'pulling numbers out of your ass!'"
Since he has already banned me from the sub he moderates, he started to resort to ad hominems (source, source, source, source).

Proof of exclusion

I published raw data as extracted from the TBB site after each report for comparison. Hayden responded that I made those numbers up and that I was pulling numbers out of my ass.
Since he was under the impression that
"The website only shows transactions from the last 7 days and then they disappear. No way for anyone to access stats beyond that." (source)
he felt confident to claim that I would be
unable to provide a source for the [missing] data and/or prove that that data was not already included in the report. (source)
Luckily for us Hayden Otto seems to dislike his competitor TravelByBit so much that he attempted to reframe Bitcoin's RBF feature as a vulnerability specific to TBB PoS system (source).
While doublespending a merchant using the TBB PoS he wanted to prove that the merchant successfully registered the purchase as complete and thus exposed that the PoS sales history of TBB's merchants are available to the public (source), in his own words:
"You can literally access it from a public URL in the Web browser. There is no login or anything required, just type in the name of the merchant." (source)
As of yet it is unclear if this is intentional by TBB or if Hayden Ottos followed the rules of responsible disclosure before publishing this kind of data leak.
As it happens, those sale histories do not only include the merchant and time of purchases, they even include the address the funds were sent to (in case of on-chain payments).
This gives us an easy method to prove that the purchases from the TBB website missing in the reports belong to a specific retail business and actually happened - something that is impossible to prove for the alleged HULA txs.
In order to make it easier for you to verify it yourself, we'll focus on a single day in the dataset, September 17th, 2019 as an example:
  • Hayden Otto's report claims 20 tx and $713.00 in total for that day (source)
  • The TBB website listed 40 tx and a total of $1032.90 (daily summary)
  • Pick a merchant, e.g. "The Stand Desserts"
  • Use Hayden's "trick" to access that merchants public sale history at, sort by date to find the 17th Sep 2019 and look for a transaction at 20:58 for $28. This proves that a purchase of said amount is associated with this specific retail business.
  • Paste the associated crypto on-chain address 17MrHiRcKzCyuKPtvtn7iZhAZxydX8raU9 in a blockchain explorer of your choice, e.g like this. This proves that a transfer of funds has actually happened.
I let software aggregate the TBB statistics with the public sale histories and you'll find at the bottom of this post a table with the on-chain addresses conveniently linked to blockchain explorers for our example date.
The total of all 40 tx is $1032.90 instead of the $713.00 reported by Hayden. 17 tx of those have a corresponding on-chain address and thus have undeniable proof of $758.10. Of the remaining 23, 22 are on Lightning and one had no merchant history available.
This is just for a single day, here is a comparison for the whole month.
Description Total
TBB Total $10,502
TBB wo. Game Ranger $5,407
TBB according to Hayden $3,737

What now?

The usual shills will respond in a predictive manner: The data must be fake even though its proof is on-chain, I would need to provide more data but HULA can be trusted without any proof, if you include outliers BCH comes out ahead, yada, yada.
But this is not important. I am not here to convince them and this post doesn't aim to.
The tx numbers we are talking about are less than 0.005% of Bitcoin's global volume. If you can increase adoption in your area by 100% by just buying 2 coffees more per day you get a rough idea about how irrelevant the numbers are in comparison.
What is relevant though and what this post aims to highlight is that and the media outlets around flooding you with the BCH #1 narrative are playing dirty. They feel justified because they feel that Bitcoin/Core/Blockstream is playing dirty as well. I am not here to judge that but you as a reader of this sub should be aware that this is happening and that you are the target.
When excludes $1,000 Bitcoin tx because of high value but includes $15,000 BCH tx because they are made by "professionals", you should be sceptical.
When excludes game developers, travel businesses or craftsmen accepting Bitcoin because they don't have a physical store but include a lawyer practice accepting BCH, you should be sceptical.
When excludes restaurants, bars and supermarkets accepting Bitcoin and when pressed reiterate that they excluded non-retail businesses without ever explaning why a restaurant shouldn't be considered reatil, you should be sceptical.
When claims the reports have been audited but omit that the data acquisition was not part of the audit, you should be sceptical.
I expect that will stop removing transactions from TBB for their reports now that it has been shown that their exclusion can be provably uncovered. I also expect that HULA's BCH numbers will rise accordingly to maintain a similar difference.
Hayden Otto assumed that nobody could cross-check the TBB data. He was wrong. Nobody will be able to disprove his claims when HULA's BCH numbers rise as he continues to refuse their release. You should treat his claims accordingly.
As usual, do your own research and draw your own conclusion. Sorry for the long read.


  • claimed no transactions were removed from the TBB dataset in their BCH #1 reports and that is impossible to prove the opposite.
  • Hayden Otto's reveals in a double spend attempt that a TBB merchant's sale history can be accessed publicly including the merchant's on-chain addresses.
  • (For example,) this table shows 40 tx listed on the TBB site on Sep 17th, including their on-chain addresses where applicable. The report lists only 20 tx for the same day.
  • (Most days and every months so far has had BTC transactions excluded.)
  • (For September, TBB lists $10,502 yet the report only claims $3,737.
No. Date Merchant Asset Address Amount Total
1 17 Sep 19 09:28 LTD Espresso Lightning Unable to find merchant history. 4.50 4.50
2 17 Sep 19 09:40 LTD Espresso Binance Coin Unable to find merchant history. 4.50 9.00
3 17 Sep 19 13:22 Josh's IGA Murray Bridge West Ether 0x40fd53aa...b6de43c531 4.60 13.60
4 17 Sep 19 13:23 Nom Nom Korean Eatery Lightning lnbc107727...zkcqvvgklf 16.00 29.60
5 17 Sep 19 13:24 Nom Nom Korean Eatery Lightning lnbc100994...mkspwddgqw 15.00 44.60
6 17 Sep 19 14:02 Nom Nom Korean Eatery Binance Coin bnb1w5mwu9...552thl4ru5 30.00 74.60
7 17 Sep 19 15:19 Dollars and Sense (Fortitude Valley) Lightning lnbc134780...93cpanyxfg 2.00 76.60
8 17 Sep 19 15:34 Steph's Cafe Binance Coin bnb124hcjy...ss3pz9y3r8 57.50 134.10
9 17 Sep 19 19:37 The Stand Desserts Binance Coin bnb13f58s9...qqc7fxln7s 18.00 152.10
10 17 Sep 19 19:59 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc575880...48cpl0z06q 8.50 160.60
11 17 Sep 19 20:00 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc575770...t8spzjflym 8.50 169.10
12 17 Sep 19 20:13 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc202980...lgqp5ha8f4 3.00 172.10
13 17 Sep 19 20:21 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc577010...decq7r4p05 8.50 180.60
14 17 Sep 19 20:24 Fat Dumpling Lightning lnbc217145...9dsqpjjr6g 32.10 212.70
15 17 Sep 19 20:31 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc574530...wvcpp3pcen 8.50 221.20
16 17 Sep 19 20:33 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc540660...rpqpzgk8z0 8.00 229.20
17 17 Sep 19 20:37 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc128468...r8cqq50p5c 19.00 248.20
18 17 Sep 19 20:39 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc135220...cngp2zq6q4 2.00 250.20
19 17 Sep 19 20:45 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc574570...atcqg738p8 8.50 258.70
20 17 Sep 19 20:51 Fat Dumpling Lightning lnbc414190...8hcpg79h9a 61.20 319.90
21 17 Sep 19 20:53 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc135350...krqqp3cz8z 2.00 321.90
22 17 Sep 19 20:58 The Stand Desserts Bitcoin 17MrHiRcKz...ZxydX8raU9 28.00 349.90
23 17 Sep 19 21:02 The Stand Desserts Bitcoin 1Hwy8hCBff...iEh5fBsCWK 10.00 359.90
24 17 Sep 19 21:03 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc743810...dvqqnuunjq 11.00 370.90
25 17 Sep 19 21:04 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc114952...2vqpclm87p 17.00 387.90
26 17 Sep 19 21:10 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc169160...lpqqqt574c 2.50 390.40
27 17 Sep 19 21:11 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc575150...40qq9yuqmy 8.50 398.90
28 17 Sep 19 21:13 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc947370...qjcp3unr33 14.00 412.90
29 17 Sep 19 21:15 The Stand Desserts Binance Coin bnb1tc2vva...xppes5t7d0 16.00 428.90
30 17 Sep 19 21:16 Giardinetto Binance Coin bnb1auyep2...w64p6a6dlk 350.00 778.90
31 17 Sep 19 21:25 The Stand Desserts BCH 3H2iJaKNXH...5sxPk3t2tV 7.00 785.90
32 17 Sep 19 21:39 The Stand Desserts Binance Coin bnb17r7x3e...avaxwumc58 8.00 793.90
33 17 Sep 19 21:47 The Stand Desserts BCH 32kuPYT1tc...uFQwgsA5ku 18.00 811.90
34 17 Sep 19 21:52 The Stand Desserts BCH 3ELPvxtCSy...4QzvfVJsNZ 36.00 847.90
35 17 Sep 19 21:56 The Stand Desserts Lightning lnbc677740...acsp04sjeg 10.00 857.90
36 17 Sep 19 22:04 The Stand Desserts BCH 38b4wHg9cg...9L2WXC2BSK 54.00 911.90
37 17 Sep 19 22:16 The Stand Desserts Binance Coin bnb14lylhs...x6wz7kjzp5 18.00 929.90
38 17 Sep 19 22:21 The Stand Desserts BCH 3L8SK3Hr7u...F3htdSPxfL 90.00 1019.90
39 17 Sep 19 22:30 The Stand Desserts Binance Coin bnb19w6tle...774uknv57t 5.00 1024.90
40 17 Sep 19 22:48 The Stand Desserts BCH 3Qag8c4UYg...9EYuWzGjhs 8.00 1032.90
submitted by YeOldDoc to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

1995 AND 1997 1 PISO COIN VALUE (#58) Bitcoin's True Value, Fake Crypto Exchange Volume, & Massive Adoption News WTF Happened to BITCOIN?! - YouTube Bitcoin Price Prediction  How likely it can hit $100K ... Bitcoin Price Prediction  $100,000 After 2021 ...

About Bitcoin. Bitcoin price today is $10,595.82 USD with a 24-hour trading volume of $50,556,435,247 USD. Bitcoin is down 1.36% in the last 24 hours. The current CoinMarketCap ranking is #1, with a market cap of $196,126,817,695 USD. Interesting tidbit: For a very long/large integer, the actual difference in length of the encoded value between base-58 and base-94 deviated only two or three characters. Hardly worth the hassles of enclosing punctuation as found in the 'toy' base-94 as supplied. Base58 Encoding Table. Address format. Bitcoin P2PKH addresses begin with the version byte value 0x00 denoting the address type and end with a 4 byte checksum. First we prepend the version byte ... A modified Base 58 binary-to-text encoding known as Base58Check is used for encoding Bitcoin addresses.. More generically, Base58Check encoding is used for encoding byte arrays in Bitcoin into human-typable strings. Set the corresponding byte value in 'raw_bytes' to the value of 'carry' modulus 58. Set 'carry' to the value of 'carry' divided by 58. 5. Test Vectors. The following examples can be used as test vectors for the algorithms in this specification: 2NEpo7TZRRrLZSi2U. The Base58 encoded value for "Hello World!" is:

[index] [31058] [23852] [12086] [14222] [4787] [14724] [20174] [18512] [18267] [3477]

1995 AND 1997 1 PISO COIN VALUE (#58)

Squarespace link: Visit and use offer code TECHQUICKIE to save 10% off your first order. Why did Bitcoin's value crash aft... With out of doubt bitcoin is the best preforming asset year to date. But will it be the best preferring asset for the next few years? We Will see. In this vi... The best way to buy bitcoin instantly with fiat currency, in my opinion, is on Cash App (affiliate): Or, you can enter the invit... According to this model that predicts bitcoin price with 95% accuracy, it indicates that bitcoin price will reach $100,000 sometime after 2021 and $1,000,000... 1995 AND 1997 1 PISO COIN VALUE (#58) Oliver's Twist ... Register here to get free bitcoin: Get ... 2017 TO 2019 20 PISO BANKNOTE POTENTIAL PRICE IN THE FUTURE (#59 ...