Technology Academics Policy - Susan Athey and Ed ...

Summary of the DATA annual meeting, April 10, 2014

I was at the Digital Asset Transfer Authority (DATA) annual meeting today. Can't give you all the details of conversations, but I'll give an overview of the speakers, panels, and general sentiment.
David Andolfatto, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis academic, gave the opening talk. It was a high level, but interesting, talk about what money is (a ledger) and how digital currencies are a natural evolution. However, he didn't think Bitcoin was good money, because it had an inflexible supply, and someone needed to manage the money supply (like the Fed). He was generally positive about Bitcoin (he specifically said it was "a stroke of genius") but didn't think it could really compete with centrally planned money.
First Panel
The first panel was about the evolution of money and had Susan Athey, econ prof from Stanford. She had some good insights about data mining the blockchain. John Clippinger from MIT Media Lab had some great thoughts about managing identities and maintaining privacy while still giving regulators what they need. David Schwartz, cryptographer from Ripple labs, didn't add much but had good thoughts. The panel was rounded out by Erik Voorhees, who was excellent as always and presented the liberty position well.
Second Panel
The next panel was about remittances as a use case. Jerry Brito from Mercatus and Michael Faye from GiveDirect talked about how digital currency could disrupt, particularly in Africa. A good nuanced point that came out was the idea that even though Bitcoin clearly has benefits over speed and cost of existing systems, for remittances having local agents is incredibly important and building those networks is very difficult.
Third Panel
The third panel was about merchants, and was one of the better panels. Jonathon Johnson, Chairman of, talked extensively about Overstock's decision and the results so far. He mentioned something I didn't know: Overstock doesn't convert 100% of bitcoin to fiat, they keep 10%. They do this because some employees have requested payment in bitcoin, and they want to pay eventually. He also mentioned that they were going to work with vendors to try and pay them in bitcoin.
Also on the panel were Tony Gallipi from Bitpay and Martine Niejadlik from Coinbase, who explained what their companies do. Tony gave a good response to a Dogecoiner who basically asked why they don't accept anything but Bitcoin, walking him through their decision framework for accepting currencies.
Fourth Panel
The fourth panel was a bunch of regulators. As Erik Voorhees said, they were basically all just talking about why their jobs are so important. I won't list all the people, but it was the SEC, IRS, staffer for a Senator, Terrorist Financing something or another, and a State Banking Supervisor.
The only thing interesting here was that the IRS lady got some pretty pointed questions, and had fluffy answers in response. Compared to merchants and developers, the regulators spoke in generalities and were pretty boring.
Speech on Law Enforcement Considerations
Stuart Tryon from the US Secret Service gave an incredibly boring and uninformative presentation about...what the Secret Service does, I guess. It wasn't really related to digital currencies at all and everyone was just waiting for lunch to start by that point.
It was pretty good.
Fifth Panel
This panel was about the global view of bitcoin. David Johnston from BitAngels had good comments about the benefits of bitcoin to other countries.
Last Panel
The last panel was about consumer protection and privacy, and was another good panel. Joshua Fairfield, professor of law was very knowledgeable about bitcoin (and surprisingly, sidechains), and had good thoughts. Berin Szoka, from TechFreedom, was very direct in saying that bitcoin could deliver on the promise of revolutionizing government that the original internet advocates promised in the early 90's.
We then finished with workshops about various areas, I was in the privacy workshop. Academic types wanted to know how we could work with regulators to comply only when necessary, the tech types were basically saying that the cat is out of the bag and any attempts to tie identity to addresses would be rejected by the community and wouldn't be technologically feasible.
In general, regulation was a major theme, whether or not the self-regulation model of DATA was sufficient or if more regulation was needed from government. Most seemed to recognize that technology specific regulation is a bad idea, but other than a few tech types everyone bought the premise that complete anonymity isn't a good thing, so the talk was how to apply existing regulation like anti-money laundering and know your customer laws in the least restrictive way.
Overall, it was good for networking and for the community to show the regulators that we aren't all radical, and hope they leave us least until the network effects are too strong to take down. Then we can be radical.
submitted by CC_EF_JTF to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

How Much Money I Made Mining Bitcoin SO FAR!!!!!!! - YouTube The Math Behind Bitcoin Is Bitcoin a flash in the pan? - Economist Susan Athey @ CoinSummit Bitcoin Protocol Tutorial: Proof of Work

In a new speech, Stanford professor, economist and Ripple board member Susan Athey analyzes how Bitcoin, banks, blockchain and RippleNet work behind the scenes. According to Athey, the peer-to-peer nature of blockchain and cryptocurrency has the potential to free people and businesses from expensive fees and errors inherent in the… — Susan Athey (@Susan_Athey) February 24, 2019. Athey’s Response and Dialog. Dr. Athey quickly responded to Brown’s complaints on Twitter, emphasizing for the public that she was a guest lecturer of the class, not its professor; and that her role as a Ripple director was emphasized at length during the class introduction. Susan Athey explains how Bitcoin works, and why virtual digital currency might change the way consumers and financial institutions do business. Athey is the Economics of Technology professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business. — Susan Athey (@Susan_Athey) February 24, 2019. Athey also provided slides used for the lecture, as proof that she did not misrepresent Bitcoin, although the slides to show that Brown’s accusations of the lecturer praising XRP are correct. Athey also used the example of a Mexican Company called Caullix to explain Ripple Labs’ product, xRapid. Tomorrow’s State of the Net conference will tackle bitcoins in one of the event’s break-out sessions. Professor Susan Athey, Stanford Graduate School of Business, and Professor Ed Felten, Princeton University, join four other panelists to explore the social and economic benefits of the digital currency.In The Third Era of Currency: How the Internet, Mathematics, & Bitcoin Are Innovating ...

[index] [33214] [5466] [8163] [16810] [9942] [3821] [8491] [31110] [17494] [13829]

How Much Money I Made Mining Bitcoin SO FAR!!!!!!! - YouTube

Susan Athey, "Machine Learning and Causal Inference for Policy Evaluation" - Duration: ... Decentralized Mining Pools for Bitcoin - Duration: 18:58. Magical Crypto Friends 1,142 views. How Bitcoin mining actually works - What is the "cryptographic puzzle"? ... 8:55. Susan Athey: The Economics of Bitcoin & Virtual Currency - Duration: 32:44. Stanford Graduate School of Business ... Susan Athey: The Economics of Bitcoin & Virtual Currency - Duration: 32:44. Stanford Graduate School of Business Recommended for you. 32:44. Learn more at Professor Susan Athey, Stanford, Andreas Antonopoulos,, Jonathan Levin, Coinometrics Moderated by Nathaniel Popper, The New York Times. Money & Tech's Jered Kenna sat down with Susan Athey, Professor of Economics at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, to discuss the economics behind Bitcoin and the impact of using a ...