bitcoind - What is rpcuser? - Bitcoin Stack Exchange

Config file on lightningd (docker)

Hello,

I have installed the lightning implementation of Elementsproject and got it up and running...
Unfortunately my node doesn't show up as a "public node", anyone knows how to fix it? link to node
I would also like to modify the fee, how can I get to the config file? (could it be in this path? - "/scratch/bitcoin/mainnet/clightning:/root/.lightning")

I have installed lightning using this guide (https://medium.com/coinmonks/installing-lightning-network-part-2-here-we-go-again-ed5a84f9cade)

and this is what I get by running lightning-ctl getinfo and listconfigs
{ "id": "03bd8e6a83933ce73fa74966b80920adc6010a1fdabea8577633088dbc5dee0662", "alias": "Lighning1", "color": "ff4500", "num_peers": 3, "num_pending_channels": 2, "num_active_channels": 1, "num_inactive_channels": 0, "address": [ { "type": "ipv4", "address": "157.230.119.206", "port": 9735 } ], "binding": [ ], "version": "v0.7.0", "blockheight": 574321, "network": "bitcoin", "msatoshi_fees_collected": 0, "fees_collected_msat": "0msat" } lightning-cli listconfigs { "# version": "v0.7.0", "rgb": "ff4500", "alias": "Lighning1", "bitcoin-rpcuser": "rpcuser", "bitcoin-rpcpassword": "rpcpass", "bitcoin-rpcconnect": "bitcoind", "pid-file": "lightningd-bitcoin.pid", "log-level": "DEBUG", "log-prefix": "lightningd(7):", "lightning-dir": "/root/.lightning", "rpc-file": "lightning-rpc", "daemon": "false", "ignore-fee-limits": false, "watchtime-blocks": 144, "max-locktime-blocks": 2016, "funding-confirms": 3, "commit-fee-min": 200, "commit-fee-max": 2000, "commit-fee": 500, "cltv-delta": 14, "cltv-final": 10, "commit-time": 10, "fee-base": 1000, "rescan": 15, "fee-per-satoshi": 10, "announce-addr": "157.230.119.206:9735", "offline": "false", "autolisten": true, "network": "bitcoin", "allow-deprecated-apis": true, "autocleaninvoice-cycle": 0, "autocleaninvoice-expired-by": 86400, "always-use-proxy": false, "disable-dns": "false" } 

Thank you for the help :)
submitted by samovar3112 to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

How to create systemd service?

I've set it up and here's a part of my bitcoin.service:
[Service] Type=simple ExecStart=/usbin/bitcoind 
I've also created a user "bitcoin" and set up permissions, folders, group, etc.
It doesn't work, it says "bitcoin.service: Service hold-off time over, scheduling restart.". When I add this:
ExecStop=/usbin/bitcoind stop 
It complains:
Error: There is no RPC client functionality in bitcoind anymore. Use the bitcoin-cli utility instead. 
My bitcoin config:
daemon=1 server=1 rpcauth=bitcoin_user1:long_pass_here 
Note that running and stopping it via command line with the & works fine. for example:
bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=bitcoin_user1 -rpcpassword=some_pass_here stop 
should I use bitcoin-cli for ExecStop? and hard-code bitcoin_user_name and password? I think this won't be right.
submitted by Matsumada to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

JSON-RPC connection failed when blockchain on USB – Please Help!

Hi,
Please be gentle.
2 weeks ago I had only ever used windows, the tor browser bundle and an electrum bitcoin wallet. Id heard of tails but never used it and knew nothing at all of coinjoin and joinmarket. I read a few things on reddit and thought id give it a try. After a lot more reading I decided on the following set up:
1.Tails with persistant on USB
2.Veracrypt install with hidden partition volume
3.bitcoin core over tor with blockchain stored on USB drive
4.joinmarket using the blockchain on my USB
5.joinmarket using the tor based irc channel
as you can imagine for a complete noob it has been a very steep learngin curve!
I was very pleased with myself today when I thought I had finnally managed to get it all set up without having to ask for help (I enjoy the intelectual challenge of working it ouy for myself) but when I tested it using python wallet-tool.py wallet.json
I get the following error:
2016-03-15 16:08:47,033 [MainThread ] [DEBUG] hello joinmarket
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "wallet-tool.py", line 89, in
load_program_config()
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/configure.py", line 223, in load_program_config
global_singleton.config)
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/configure.py", line 242, in get_blockchain_interface_instance
bc_interface = BitcoinCoreInterface(rpc, network)
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/blockchaininterface.py", line 492, in init
blockchainInfo = self.jsonRpc.call("getblockchaininfo", [])
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/jsonrpc.py", line 111, in call
response = self.queryHTTP(request)
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/jsonrpc.py", line 100, in queryHTTP
repr(exc))
joinmarket.jsonrpc.JsonRpcConnectionError: JSON-RPC connection failed. Err:error(111, 'Connection refused')
so close yet still so far!!!!! I havent been able to find an answer to this anywhere and simply have no idea what it means or how to fix it. so am posting here in the hope someone can help or point me in the right direction. my bitcoin and joinmarket settings are as follows:
/home/amnesia/Persistent/bitcoin-0.11.2/bin/bitcoin.conf
rpcuser=bitcoin
rpcpassword=password
daemon=1
proxyrandomize=1
proxy=127.0.0.1:9050
listen=0
server=1
For JoinMarket
walletnotify=curl -sI --connect-timeout 1 http://localhost:62602/walletnotify?%s
alertnotify=curl -sI --connect-timeout 1 http://localhost:62602/alertnotify?%s
User must uncomment and input path to blockchain files
datadir=/media/amnesia/590C-2CF0/bitcoin
/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket.cfg
[BLOCKCHAIN]
blockchain_source = bitcoin-rpc
network = mainnet
rpc_host = localhost
rpc_port = 8332
rpc_user = bitcoin
rpc_password = password
[MESSAGING]
host = 6dvj6v5imhny3anf.onion
channel = joinmarket-pit
port = 6698
usessl = true
socks5 = true
socks5_host = localhost
socks5_port = 9050
maker_timeout_sec = 30
and can anyone confirm I am right in thinking that to run bitcoin core over tor I just choose socks5 and port 9050 in the settings, there's nothing else I need to change? Told you I was a noob!
Thanks in advance for any help and please forgive me if I dont understand your answer at first.
i also have no idea how to sort out the formatting of that post, sorry!!!!
submitted by smokingskills1 to joinmarket [link] [comments]

tailsjoin full node connection failed

I've been trying to get joinmarket running with a full node working forever and I'm almost there but I keep getting this error.
2016-04-18 22:09:43,109 [MainThread ] [DEBUG] hello joinmarket Traceback (most recent call last):
File "wallet-tool.py", line 89, in
load_program_config() 
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/configure.py", line 222, in \load_program_config
global_singleton.config)
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/configure.py", line 241, in \get_blockchain_interface_instance
bc_interface = BitcoinCoreInterface(rpc, network) 
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/blockchaininterface.py", line 492, in
init blockchainInfo = self.jsonRpc.call("getblockchaininfo", [])
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/jsonrpc.py", line 111, in call
response = self.queryHTTP(request) 
File "/home/amnesia/Persistent/joinmarket/joinmarket/jsonrpc.py", line 100, in queryHTTP
repr(exc))
joinmarket.jsonrpc.JsonRpcConnectionError: JSON-RPC connection failed. Err:error(111, \'Connection refused')

joinmarket.cfg:

[BLOCKCHAIN] blockchain_source = bitcoin-rpc #options: blockr, bitcoin-rpc, json-rpc, regtest # for instructions on bitcoin-rpc read # https://github.com/chris-belchejoinmarket/wiki/Running-JoinMarket-with-Bitcoin-Core-full-node network = mainnet rpc_host = 127.0.0.1 rpc_port = 8332 rpc_user = bitcoin rpc_password = password
[MESSAGING] #host = irc.cyberguerrilla.org channel = joinmarket-pit #port = 6697 #usessl = true #socks5 = false socks5_host = 127.0.0.1 socks5_port = 9050 #for tor host = 6dvj6v5imhny3anf.onion port = 6697 usessl = true socks5 = true maker_timeout_sec = 30

bitcoin.conf:

rpcuser=bitcoin rpcpassword=password daemon=1 proxyrandomize=1 proxy=127.0.0.1:9050 listen=0 server=1
# For JoinMarket
walletnotify=curl -sI --connect-timeout 1 http://127.0.0.1:62602/walletnotify?%s
alertnotify=curl -sI --connect-timeout 1 http://127.0.0.1:62602/alertnotify?%s
# User must uncomment and input path to blockchain files
datadir=/home/amnesia/Persistent/.bitcoin"
Can any please help?
submitted by frustratedtails to joinmarket [link] [comments]

error: incorrect rpcuser or rpcpassword (authorization failed) /r/Bitcoin

error: incorrect rpcuser or rpcpassword (authorization failed) /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

hodlmon.sh: a UTXO monitoring methodology and script for true connoisseurs of security, paranoia and BTC maximalism

EDIT:
Disclaimer: the below script is provided for example purposes only. You're responsible for your own security. Don't trust, verify.
tldr: the script is literally just an example wrapper to call "gettxout" on your own node via cron to check if your own utxo has been spent yet
OK, since there are a few questions on security below, let me clarify: this script is only for people who are 1) already running their own nodes and 2) can understand the bash script below. And obviously, don't trust some random person on the internet, always verify. I provided this as an example for a way to monitor your own UTXOs with your existing node. Those of you who understand what the below script does will see it's painfully simple and obviously harmless. Those of you who don't understand it, just ignore this post, or better yet, research what the below means until you do understand it. What's important is the idea of monitoring your own UTXO, and this script is an example of how to do that with gettxout.
ORIGINAL POST:
Submitting this to help strengthen the community, and for review:
hodlmon.sh: a UTXO monitoring methodology and script for true connoisseurs of security, paranoia and BTC maximalism
Monitor canary UTXOs for early detection of compromised private keys BEFORE funds are lost, using your own full node for maximum privacy and trustlessness. Note that you will need to implement your own notification strategy (email, push, sms, etc). This script is intended to run on your full node, but can be run from any machine with RPC access to your full node.
hodlmon.sh is designed to check if a given UTXO (i.e. a specific output of a specific btc transaction) has been spent or not. This can be used for early and proactive detection if a seed phrase or private key has been compromised, so you have time to move your btc before full compromise happens. In order for this to work, a small amount of btc should be sent to an address controlled only by a given seedphrase, with that seedphrase being part of a multisig wallet or a seedphrase+passphrase wallet, and the majority of your funds controlled in the seedphrase+passphrase or multisig wallet. The idea is to leave the small amount of btc (the canary utxo) in the address, so that it never moves unless the seedphrase that controls it has been compromised and all funds in the wallet swept. In this way, you use those compromised sats to buy information about the current security status of your wallet(s).
Example usage:Set up a cron job to run hodlmon.sh every 30 min to check if transaction output at index "0" for transaction with id "123" has been spent already. Use "my_utxo_nickname" as a friendly name for the UTXO (to differentiate between multiple wallets)
*/30 * * * * /path/to/hodlmon.sh 123 0 my_utxo_nickname > /tmp/hodlmon_log 2> /tmp/hodlmon_err_log
Usage scenario #1: Seedphrase (A) + passphrase (A')Majority of funds are held in a wallet controlled by both the seedphrase and passphrase, A and A'. A token amount of btc is controlled only by seedphrase A.
A + A': majority of funds
A: canary UTXO
hodlmon.sh is used to monitor the canary funds locked by A, so that if it is discovered that A has been compromised, the funds locked by A and A' can be moved to a new wallet before the passphrase A' can be cracked and all your funds exfiltrated.
Usage scenario #2: multisig e.g. 2 of 3, with seed phrases A, B and CMajority of funds held in a multisig wallet controlled by 3 seedphrases A, B, and C. 3 small canary UTXOs are held in wallets each controlled by A, B or C, respectively.
A + B + C: majority of funds
A: canary UTXO 1
B: canary UTXO 2
C: canary UTXO 3
One benefit of multisig (e.g. 2 of 3) is that even if 1 key is compromised, your funds are safe, since at least 2 keys are needed to release funds. But how do you that none of the keys has yet been compromised? If you create separate wallets controlled each by only 1 of the individual keys, and use hodlmon.sh to monitor whether those UTXOs have been exfiltrated, then you can detect partial compromise of your setup before a full exfiltration event takes place, so you can move your funds to a new multisig wallet with freshly generated and uncompromised keys.
Example of 3 cronjobs to monitor all 3 canary UTXOs:
*/30 * * * * /path/to/hodlmon.sh 123 0 key1 > /tmp/hodlmon_log_1 2> /tmp/hodlmon_err_log_1
*/30 * * * * /path/to/hodlmon.sh 456 0 key2 > /tmp/hodlmon_log_2 2> /tmp/hodlmon_err_log_2
*/30 * * * * /path/to/hodlmon.sh 789 0 key3 > /tmp/hodlmon_log_3 2> /tmp/hodlmon_err_log_3

Example hodlmon script:
#########################################################################
#!/bin/bash
touch /tmp/hodlmon_last_run
echo "Transaction ID: $1"
echo "Output #: $2"
echo "Nickname: $3"
NODE_IP=127.0.0.1 #TODO: use actual value
USER=user#TODO: use actual value
PASS=pass #TODO: use actual value
PORT=8332 #TODO: use actual value
CHECK_CMD="/uslocal/bin/bitcoin-cli -rpcconnect=$NODE_IP -rpcuser=$USER -rpcpassword=$PASS -rpcport=$PORT gettxout $1 $2"
RESULT="$($CHECK_CMD)"
echo "${RESULT}"
if [ "$RESULT" == "" ]
then
echo "UTXO HAS BEEN SPENT! RED ALERT!!"
MSG="The UTXO for $3 from tx $1 output $2 has moved!"
#TODO: ADD YOUR FAVORITE NOTIFICATION STRATEGY E.G. EMAIL, PUSH NOTIFICATION, SMS
else
echo "UTXO is still on ice"
fi
############################################

submitted by facepalm5000 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

I built lightningd, and now am running it, and running into this problem where bcli seems to be returning wrong json (with bitcoind running too)

So I have confirmed that the bitcoin-cli.exe is being invoked, with the arguments shown. But I am not sure why this error is coming up. If I run bitcoin-cli.exe from command line, I can easily get replies for command like getblockchaininfo, which confirms that bitcoind is running.

Here is what I get as output of lightningd command:
2020-08-30T17:35:53.634Z INFO plugin-bcli: bitcoin-cli initialized and connected to bitcoind. /uslocal/bin/../libexec/c-lightning/plugins/bcli error: bad response to getrawblockbyheight (bad 'result' field), response was {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":8,"error":{"code":400,"message":"bitcoin-cli.exe -datadir=G:\\\\.bitcoin -rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 -rpcport=8332 -rpcuser=... -rpcpassword=... getblockhash 646000: bad JSON: bad blockhash (00000000000000000001ef19be9c9879c6e9aa6241a096f543109e2a34397936\r\n)"} } 
Not sure why I am seeing this problem.
Update: I got it running. Now I see this
2020-08-30T23:45:47.611Z INFO plugin-bcli: bitcoin-cli initialized and connected to bitcoind. 2020-08-30T23:45:48.728Z INFO lightningd: -------------------------------------------------- 2020-08-30T23:45:48.729Z INFO lightningd: Server started with public key 03c7505d1ac56441f234025cd348743cddff147f9356e6296820d5e95d1a56b29d, alias GREENTOLL (color #03c750) and lightningd v0.9.0-197-gdd8cd81-modded 
I've no clue what I am doing, but will continue digging more.
submitted by parakite to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

Need Help Connecting To A Remote Node

I'm not entirely sure what I'm doing wrong, but I'm attempting to connect Zap to my remote node and it continues to fail. I accidentally deleted my old config and for some reason the new one I created isn't working. I've tried removing my tls cert as well with no success. I'm sure to restart my node every time I change the config too. Am I missing something? The config is as follows:
bitcoin.active=1 bitcoin.mainnet=1 bitcoin.node=bitcoind bitcoind.rpchost=localhost bitcoind.rpcuser= bitcoind.rpcpass= bitcoind.zmqpubrawblock=127.0.0.1:28332 bitcoind.zmqpubrawtx=127.0.0.1:28333 tlscertpath=~/.lnd/tls.cert tlskeypath=~/.lnd/tls.key tlsextraip=:10009 listen=0.0.0.0:9735 restlisten=0.0.0.0:8080 rpclisten=localhost:10009 maxpendingchannels=10 alias= color= bitcoin.defaultchanconfs=0 tor.active=1 tor.v3=1 adminmacaroonpath=~/.lnd/data/chain/bitcoin/mainnet/admin.macaroon 
Any help is appreciated :-)
Thanks!
Edit: Formatting
submitted by wesslle to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

Question about LND

I compiled LND from source on Ubuntu 18 and have a full (non-pruned) indexed bitcoind node on the same machine. The setup instructions say to use
lnd --bitcoin.active --bitcoin.testnet --debuglevel=debug --bitcoin.node=bitcoind --bitcoind.rpcuser=xxxx --bitcoind.rpcpass=xxxx --bitcoind.zmqpubrawblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:28332 --bitcoind.zmqpubrawtx=tcp://127.0.0.1:28333 --externalip=xxxx 
However, I didn't use --bitcoin.testnet. I used --bitcoin.mainnet instead. Is that ok? Are there any drawbacks to this? I can confirm that the wallet was created in ~/.lnd/data/chain/bitcoin/mainnet/ Also, my bitcoin.conf file has testnet=0. I haven't done anything else yet.
submitted by 1Tim1_15 to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

What are recommended bitcoin.conf settings when using c-lightning?

I'm running full (non-pruned) bitcoin core 0.20 on Ubuntu 18. My current bitcoin.conf is:
txindex=1 listenonion=0 server=1 rpcuser=xxx rpcpassword=xxx rpcthreads=1 
If I use c-lightning, what changes do I need to make to the above file? Thanks in advance.
submitted by 1Tim1_15 to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

Connecting bitcoin-qt to bitcoind on local network

Hello,
I have a bitcoin node running on a headless box (bitcoind) and I would like to connect to it using bitcoin-qt on my desktop. I'm getting a little confused with the process.... does bitcoin-qt need to connect to bitcoind using RPC? Do I store my wallet file on the bitcoind box, or bitcoin-qt box?
The bitcoin node is already setup to work with an electrum server, so I already have rpcbind=0.0.0.0, rpcallowip=$ELECTRUX_IP, and rpcuserpcpassword set. I tried adding my desktop IP to rpcallowip, and setting the appropriate username/password in bitcoin-qt's bitcoin.conf, but no luck. I can see in debug.log for bitcoin-qt that the connection is rejected.

The node runs over TOR and I have onlynet=onion set in bitcoind's bitcoin.conf, but that doesn't seem to stop electrumx connecting via RPC over clearnet, so this shouldn't be an issue right?

Am I missing something here? Help would be much appreciated!
submitted by backfromBTCpast to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin core RPC very slow: "mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx"

I am running bitcoin core v0.18.0 and noticed that now my queries made locally through the RPC are taking very long. Here is my bitcoin.conf:
txindex=1 datadir=/media/**** maxmempool=30000 mempoolexpiry=99999 choosedatadir=1 checkblocks=3 minrelayfee=0 maxconnections=9999 debug=mempool debug=mempoolrej addnode=*** addnode=*** logips=1 rest=1 rpcuser=*** rpcpassword=*** 
And here is a sample of the log, notice the unusual mapOrphan overflow lines:
20-05-21T21:04:09Z AcceptToMemoryPool: peer=33: accepted 1755b76d790f73252c0ccf890477803aa295444953514fc5c9aad8c2fe6154e0 (poolsz 20383 txn, 105635 kB) 2020-05-21T21:04:09Z stored orphan tx 89cdced1c7c61bf59633af323fd2dbe07c5a6859c51d83247f0fb01b83eb1451 (mapsz 101 outsz 137) 2020-05-21T21:04:09Z mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z AcceptToMemoryPool: peer=26: accepted 1122f2315279bc0378fe51733638ede97dcaa938c2fcbd930d91ac2405999fcd (poolsz 20385 txn, 105762 kB) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z AcceptToMemoryPool: peer=33: accepted 95bd4499ffd3111dab98dbbcb565ff897f21a07c9242659cd38f452022267f78 (poolsz 20386 txn, 105763 kB) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z stored orphan tx 8c547967ff198c286770f966256c3b09482c5390a93016e597d8a1c6c6699afa (mapsz 101 outsz 138) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z stored orphan tx 2d5fcb835d580caa7fd32f0260cb4ce0e5edf67bf1dc134d1153d6d3118c7009 (mapsz 101 outsz 138) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z AcceptToMemoryPool: peer=20: accepted a49508232092870d58d4f7c63127cb688897d25f8ba1fb0d1c86e4c4b09a2f00 (poolsz 20387 txn, 105764 kB) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z stored orphan tx 854ccbbd7fd0f04b466dec92df3cbfe96fd8aa25eb0aa17a8524aa82a4bff6ff (mapsz 101 outsz 138) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z stored orphan tx 8ee4f6de0f5d9bdeaa840749193799636b22498711401936e86fc265574430f7 (mapsz 101 outsz 138) 2020-05-21T21:04:10Z mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx 
The node is up-to-date and I didn't detect anything unusual (like a stale block/fork).
submitted by johnturtle to BitcoinBeginners [link] [comments]

Questions about running a full node on a raspberry pi

I am setting up a full node on my raspberry pi (with 4 gb ram), which is connected to a 1TB external hard drive. I have some questions:
  1. How can I tell bitcoind that I would like it to store chain data on the external hard drive (which I have mounted to /mnt/harddrive)?
  2. After running ./configure, I still don't see ~/.bitcoin/ present. I have created the directory, but how will bitcoind know where to look for the configuration file, bitcoin.conf?
  3. I am hoping to do some data analysis of historical bitcoin transaction data using RPC. Is this the most efficient way to retrieve information?
  4. What settings should I have in the bitcoin.conf file to ensure that I can read historical data? Right now, I have txindex=1, rpcuserpcpassword, server=1, daemon=1. Am I missing any obvious ones? (I haven't been able to find a full spec on what is and isn't allowed in the configuration file).
Thanks in advance!
submitted by AdvancedStock3 to BitcoinBeginners [link] [comments]

No inbound connections on my bitcoin full node with TOR

update: it's ok now, it only required some time. Also, looking at debug.log it won't show anything about inbound connections as I thought, it must be used `bitcoin-cli getpeerinfo` in order to get all the connections info (inbound + outbound)
Can someone connect to my node? u3ob433qu3ebkmsu.onion:8333
I'm behind a CG-NAT so I thought to use TOR to overcame it but still I have outbound connections but no inbound.
$ bitcoin-cli getnetworkinfo
{ "version": 180000, "subversion": "/Satoshi:0.18.0/", "protocolversion": 70015, "localservices": "000000000000040c", "localrelay": true, "timeoffset": 0, "networkactive": true, "connections": 10, "networks": [ { "name": "ipv4", "limited": true, "reachable": false, "proxy": "127.0.0.1:9050", "proxy_randomize_credentials": true }, { "name": "ipv6", "limited": true, "reachable": false, "proxy": "127.0.0.1:9050", "proxy_randomize_credentials": true }, { "name": "onion", "limited": false, "reachable": true, "proxy": "127.0.0.1:9050", "proxy_randomize_credentials": true } ], "relayfee": 0.00001000, "incrementalfee": 0.00001000, "localaddresses": [ { "address": "u3ob433qu3ebkmsu.onion", "port": 8333, "score": 4 } ], "warnings": "" } 
bitcoin.conf
server=1 daemon=1 # RPC rpcuser=***** rpcpassword=******* # TOR onlynet=onion proxy=127.0.0.1:9050 bind=127.0.0.1 dnsseed=0 dns=0 addnode=nkf5e6b7pl4jfd4a.onion addnode=yu7sezmixhmyljn4.onion # Raspberry Pi optimizations dbcache=100 maxorphantx=10 maxmempool=50 maxconnections=40 maxuploadtarget=5000 prune=6000 
submitted by LiL0u to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

node information on explorers

I'm trying to set my first c-lightning node with docker-compose using image from https://hub.docker.com/elementsproject/lightningd. currently, my node can connect and open channel with other nodes (and I can open a channel to the node just fine), but it's still not updated (ie. has no information) on most explorers.
the following is result of getinfo and listconfigs
getinfo { "id": "03db40337c2de299a8fa454fdf89d311615d50a27129d43286696d9e497b2b027a", "alias": "TestName", "color": "fff000", "num_peers": 3, "num_pending_channels": 0, "num_active_channels": 3, "num_inactive_channels": 0, "address": [ { "type": "ipv4", "address": "68.183.195.14", "port": 9735 } ], "binding": [ { "type": "ipv4", "address": "172.18.0.3", "port": 9735 } ], "version": "v0.7.1-906-gf657146", "blockheight": 601917, "network": "bitcoin", "msatoshi_fees_collected": 0, "fees_collected_msat": "0msat" } listconfigs { "# version": "v0.7.1-906-gf657146", "lightning-dir": "/root/.lightning", "wallet": "sqlite3:///root/.lightning/lightningd.sqlite3", "plugin": "/uslocal/bin/../libexec/c-lightning/plugins/pay", "plugin": "/uslocal/bin/../libexec/c-lightning/plugins/autoclean", "plugin": "/uslocal/bin/../libexec/c-lightning/plugins/fundchannel", "network": "bitcoin", "allow-deprecated-apis": true, "always-use-proxy": false, "daemon": "false", "rpc-file": "lightning-rpc", "rgb": "fff000", "alias": "HubTest", "bitcoin-rpcuser": [redacted], "bitcoin-rpcpassword": [redacted], "bitcoin-rpcconnect": "bitcoind", "bitcoin-retry-timeout": 60, "pid-file": "lightningd-bitcoin.pid", "ignore-fee-limits": false, "watchtime-blocks": 144, "max-locktime-blocks": 2016, "funding-confirms": 3, "commit-fee-min": 200, "commit-fee-max": 2000, "commit-fee": 500, "cltv-delta": 14, "cltv-final": 10, "commit-time": 10, "fee-base": 0, "rescan": 15, "fee-per-satoshi": 1, "max-concurrent-htlcs": 30, "min-capacity-sat": 10000, "bind-addr": "172.18.0.3:9735", "announce-addr": "68.183.195.14:9735", "offline": "false", "autolisten": true, "disable-dns": "false", "enable-autotor-v2-mode": "false", "encrypted-hsm": false, "log-level": "DEBUG", "log-prefix": "lightningd(7):" } 
is there something wrong with this configuration? or is it another issue?
I understand that explorers update their node list irregularly, and as far as the node can open channels (and can be connected), everything is fine. but this thing has bugging me for weeks.
thank you~
edit=c-lightning
submitted by 17hubest to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

Bitcoind stuck in startup loading block index

Hi,
I have had bitcoin core running on a raspberry pi for about 4 month now (followed the raspibolt instructions from stadicus) and it worked fine until 3 days ago it suddenly stopped working. With bitcoin-cli blockchaininfo i got
error code: -28 Loading block index... 
or something similar. When a looked in the debug log file i saw this:
2019-08-29T16:48:08Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/db.log 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z init message: Loading banlist... 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z Cache configuration: 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z * Using 2.0 MiB for block index database 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z * Using 8.0 MiB for chain state database 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z * Using 90.0 MiB for in-memory UTXO set (plus up to 47.7 MiB of unused mempool space) 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z init message: Loading block index... 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z Opened LevelDB successfully 2019-08-29T16:48:11Z Using obfuscation key for /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index: 0000000000000000 2019-08-29T16:54:14Z 2019-08-29T16:54:14Z Bitcoin Core version v0.18.1 (release build) 2019-08-29T16:54:14Z Assuming ancestors of block 0000000000000000000f1c54590ee18d15ec70e68c8cd4cfbadb1b4f11697eee have valid signatures. 2019-08-29T16:54:14Z Setting nMinimumChainWork=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000051dc8b82f450202ecb3d471 2019-08-29T16:54:14Z Using the 'standard' SHA256 implementation 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Default data directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using data directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Config file: /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using at most 20 automatic connections (1024 file descriptors available) 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for signature cache, able to store 524288 elements 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for script execution cache, able to store 524288 elements 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using 4 threads for script verification 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z scheduler thread start 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z HTTP: creating work queue of depth 16 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Config options rpcuser and rpcpassword will soon be deprecated. Locally-run instances may remove rpcuser to use cookie-based auth, or may be replaced with rpcauth. Please see share/rpcauth for rpcauth auth generation. 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z HTTP: starting 4 worker threads 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using wallet directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)... 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April 9, 2010) 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z Using wallet /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin 2019-08-29T16:54:15Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/db.log 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z init message: Loading banlist... 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z Cache configuration: 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z * Using 2.0 MiB for block index database 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z * Using 8.0 MiB for chain state database 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z * Using 90.0 MiB for in-memory UTXO set (plus up to 47.7 MiB of unused mempool space) 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z init message: Loading block index... 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z Opened LevelDB successfully 2019-08-29T16:54:16Z Using obfuscation key for /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index: 0000000000000000 
After that there should follow a line about Loading the block index but it never appears.
It seems to be restarting without shutting down correctly, maybe it cannot find the block index? I tried reinstalling core, recreating the symlink to the hdd and resetting the service but nothing happened. Everytime it starts it gets stuck at the same point. It also takes an awful long time to stop bitcoind but i don't know if that is normal.
I found several people with similar problems online but noting helped so far. Has anyone had a similar problem in the past and found a solution to this?
submitted by BologneseWithCheese to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Guide to running bitcoind on a Raspberry Pi 4 (4gb ram) on an external hard drive

I have seen a lot of guides online but for a few reasons I thought it'd be good to share how I set up my full node (with relatively few headaches) and less than $150.

Stuff to get

  1. Raspberry Pi 4 (4gb ram is essential!) - $55
  2. Power cable for the raspberry pi - $10
  3. Case for the raspberry pi - $5 (optional, looks good and makes it easier to store)
  4. microHDMI to HDMI cable (needed to view desktop of raspberry pi) - $10
  5. SD Card, at least 8GB - ~$10+ (PS: you may also need a converter to read/write from your PC to the SD card).
  6. External hard drive, ideally at least a 1TB - $50+

Setup the Raspberry pi

  1. Download NOOBS and unzip it to SD card, and insert the SD card into the Raspberry Pi.
  2. Insert the SD card into the Raspberry Pi, and place the Raspberry Pi into its case. Connect the relevant cables, and plug in the power to the Raspberry Pi.
  3. Follow the instructions on screen to get Raspian up and running.

Configuring the External Hard Drive

  1. Turn off automount
  2. Configure the raspberry pi to mount the external hard drive where you want it. See this page on how to configure external hard drives for Raspberry Pis.

Download and configure bitcoin-core

  1. Go to bitcoin.org and download bitcoin-core.
  2. Follow the instructions here and install bitcoin-core.
  3. Create a directory called .bitcoin from the home directory.
  4. Create a file called bitcoin.conf in ~/.bitcoin. Add the following settings to it to ensure that you can process historical transactions:

server=1 txindex=1 rpcuser= rpcpassword= datadir= dbcache=2500 

Run bitcoind

  1. From the command line, run bitcoind -daemon
  2. Now you can run bitcoin-cli -getinfo or tail /debug.log to get info on how bitcoind is doing.
That should do it. Assuming a solid internet connection, you should be up and running relatively quickly (less than a day). If you need help, feel free to ask questions below. I'd be happy to help.
submitted by AdvancedStock3 to BlockchainDataScience [link] [comments]

Chat_Report.25>2 - XL

[22:12] it's not like I'm going to be offended that someone feels that way [22:12] but it's not healthy to be a dick about it, and that's kind of the only way that I can think to be able to deal with it [22:12] I guess, that's not a bad way to think about it [22:12] if you're having trouble dealing with it [22:12] I guess I just have to accept that I am not an expert on that [22:12] but I do have the most basic understanding of the concept [22:12] and I have always known what a "dissociative" is [22:12] and that they are in fact a distinct psychological state [22:13] I didn't have to google to find out [22:13] and in fact I have been working on a book on dissociative phenomena for a number of years [22:13] you mean you were trying to find out what they were? [22:13] i just finished [22:14] i got the manuscript finished and submitted a copy [22:14] well, the "book" is still on your todo list [22:14] i'm very anxious to publish [22:15] what about the research? are you doing any research on it? [22:15] and yes [22:16] some, but the bulk of my effort is in trying to make sense of it [22:16] what are you doing to help us understand it? [22:16] and i have a blogpost of my own that goes into the background of the phenomenon [22:16] it would be great if you could tell us a little about it [22:16] it sounds as if the phenomenon has something to do with people who have had a life-altering experience [22:17] and that the thing they have experienced is so powerful that it is capable of completely altering a person's personality [22:17] (well, that and the fact that a person who had such an experience could have access to the internet) [22:17] i'm sorry, but why not just tell us about it in full detail, instead of asking me a bunch of question and letting me decide what to ask [22:18] it would be very convenient to you [22:18] if you hadnt decided not to talk about it until after i had. [22:18] if you want to know more, it's quite common for people with this kind of problem to share their stories. [22:18] (i'm not sure if its normal, but i can assure you its not something i wouldn't ever do to any of you) [22:19] so i don't know what you're implying by saying you're uncomfortable with talking about it? [22:19] i'm just saying that i'm not going to force you to talk about it just because you told me it was hard to talk about [22:19] ok. [22:20] so this is it: you must come here with me now [22:20] ok [22:20] and I'll go to the other rooms and meet everyone. [22:20] I want to make this a place for everyone [22:21] ok [22:21] i'll talk to you when i get there [22:21] OK, I need a little more detail [22:22] What's the plan for getting it into the house? [22:22] well i'll let you know when i get there [22:22] Ok, thanks [22:22] i'll be back around 12:30 and ill be there [22:23] I've sent you a PM for the key and I'll be waiting for you to talk to her [22:23] lol [22:23] *key [22:23] ouch [22:24] But that's just me [22:24] You can't just go and do it like that, y'know? [22:24] lol [22:25] but if it's just a matter of asking me nicely, i don't mind [22:25] just send it to me and i'll do it [22:25] if that's what you want [22:25] I've never asked you to do anything but that, and I know you haven't, but, that's my opinion [22:26] I mean, if it helps you out a little bit, maybe I could just... [22:26] Vorpas, that's okay. I mean, I think you're pretty amazing, I do, I do. I just don't know what you want to do with your life. I think I'd like to try and get the people that are in the game to understand the power and the importance of the community. I mean, when you're playing against, when you see a really bad player, you can tell that that player is having fun, that they are having fun playing the game, because they are making a lot of money, and then you can just understand that it would be fun to play, and there would be a lot of money to be made by just playing the game. And I think the players that are playing it, maybe they don't know what's happening, and maybe they have the wrong idea about it. But it's okay, I'm not going to judge them, it's their own opinion and they're free to believe whatever they want to believe. [22:27] But, I'm just gonna leave that part up to you. [22:27] Cool. [22:27] So I'm just gonna be, like, really happy for you, 'cause I know you've been putting a lot of work into this. [22:28] You are doing it so well! [22:28] And I really appreciate that, like, for the last few months, it's been a struggle to stay motivated enough to do this. [22:28] I am a bit concerned about how long this will take. [22:28] I am just going to say this, if I'm going to continue doing this, I want you guys to stay around. [22:29] Well, I would love to keep helping, but I'm not sure what my plans are at the moment. [22:29] If you were to make a donation, that would be fantastic [22:29] You know, the donations are very helpful. I just thought that it might be good to keep track of who donated what. [22:29] Vorpas_Jabwak, I can try to get someone to check if this was indeed you that made the donation? [22:29] Oh, yeah. [22:29] Thanks! [22:29] You've probably never received one before, but if you were, that would be awesome. [22:30] Just wanted to let you know the new version of Mumble is being released and working on the beta channel. [22:31] If you do have the software I'd love to hear some feedback. I have a lot of questions for it. [22:32] I have a lot of questions for it too, but it's a bit complicated so I might not get a chance to do that anytime soon. I'll make sure to get on that when it is ready. [22:33] I'm glad you like it, I know I really do. I love having an easier to use, but powerful, voice chat. [22:34] I'd really like to make some more changes to the system, and try it out as a whole. But right now it's pretty darned good. [22:35] Thanks Jak. :) [22:35] I'll try my best to keep them updated. [22:35] Ok, I'll let you know when I get to them, Jak [22:35] Sorry if I didn't keep up with you guys. [22:36] Haha, sorry. [22:36] I'll see you around, Jak [22:36] *takes off* [22:36] Sup everyone? [22:36] I'm out [22:36] *in [22:37] sup [22:37] Hey! [22:37] So are you guys all there yet? [22:37] :P [22:38] * Turoth sets mode: +b KhaosReigns [22:38] Oh! I thought you all quit on me [22:38] * Turoth sets mode: +b KhaosReigns+ [22:38] So uh, what's my problem? [22:38] I was hoping you'd tell me to stop [22:38] I was so upset [22:38] I'm sorry [22:38] I should have been better [22:39] I didn't mean to startle you [22:39] You've just always made me feel like I could take care of myself [22:39] I guess I didn't realize that it takes a lot of people to keep the lights on [22:40] I'm sorry, I've never been this shy around people [22:40] It's been such a long time [22:41] This whole situation is just a shock [22:41] I'm starting to feel really nervous [22:41] I have to go home now [22:42] Ok [22:42] I'll see you later [22:42] Ohh, bye [22:42] Take care [22:42] Yeah, it's a long way home [22:42] Have a nice night [22:42] Thanks for everything. I had fun. [22:42] night [22:42] I hope you have a good night. [22:42] Have a nice night. [22:42] Thanks. [22:42] Have a good night. [22:42] Good night [22:42] How is everyone? [22:42] I'm fine. [22:42] Tired, but fine. [22:42] Yeah. [22:43] i dont know what happened [22:43] Don't know yet, so I'm trying to get the details. [22:43] I went out to get food [22:43] got a pizza, was eating it when I was interrupted by my girlfriend [22:43] and she was saying she wanted to see me [22:43] i don't even know where i am right now [22:44] so she called me at work this morning and said 'well, i'm sorry i couldn't make it for you today', and i had to tell her 'okay' [22:45] i cant find her or the phone number or anything [22:45] i was just in the car, and she was in the kitchen [22:45] it must of been a while [22:45] i think she was off last night [22:46] that's funny that you would call me like that [22:46] then you should know that she has been off for a while [22:46] she said she was sick, and i think she said she was going to stay home and rest and it wasn't till today that i found out the truth [22:46] yeah it's a real bummer that it was a false alarm [22:46] like i said she could have possibly been sick but wasnt being honest about it [22:46] it is a big bummer that we wasted so much time on it, but it doesn't change that we found her body [22:46] yeah we know how the night went, we just dont know if she was really asleep when the phone rang [22:46] i just wish she would have just told us the truth instead of getting her feelings hurt [22:46] the real question is: why is it a phone? [22:46] that's all i got [22:46] so that's it [22:46] yeah and she's got to go find out if she's pregnant [22:46] and i guess there's no point in trying to hide the pregnancy [22:46] she said it was just a few days ago [22:46] wait what [22:46] maybe her parents are going to find it [22:46] ok [22:46] maybe if her parents find out she's pregnant [22:46] they'll just throw you out [22:46] they will [22:47] why do you think she was crying? [22:47] well, I mean, I know it's weird but [22:47] no, you're right [22:47] I mean, it was pretty strange [22:47] she just seemed, well [22:47] I don't think she could have known the guy or not [22:47] there's been plenty of reports of people getting "paedo" on the site [22:47] so it could have just been that her brain just caught on [22:47] like that one guy who was arrested last year for having a lot of chatroom porn [22:47] which is like a whole different thing [22:48] and it just happened to be in that section that she kept checking [22:48] yeah [22:48] like it's not like she has this huge fucking file of porn on her computer [22:48] so if it happens to be in one place, it's not like she's a big fucking voyeur [22:49] but still, she was watching the entire thing [22:49] yes, and that is probably why the guy stopped her [22:49] I can see your point of view [22:50] and it was also in that section that she just kept checking [22:50] yes, and I can say that she just seemed so interested in the guy that she wouldn't mind if he was watching [22:50] and that's not exactly the case with me either [22:50] but, if she's only interested in other men, then she's obviously gay [22:51] which is just something to remember [22:51] and she's so smart, but I can't see her getting on with me [22:51] she has a crush on me, but I don't even know where to start [22:52] I was at a party in NY, and someone I knew was talking to her, and they had been flirting. I didn't get a chance to respond, but I am a nice guy. She said she didn't want to talk about it any more. I am a nice guy, and I know that flirting is bad, but I also know that I like her and I think that there's a chance that it could go somewhere. I want to have a relationship with her, I don't really know where to start [22:52] you'd have to ask her yourself [22:52] but it seems like you don't have to [22:52] but if that's your only point she can't really say something else... [22:52] i think if you were to say you didn't want to have sex with her, you would lose her... [22:52] i'm not even really interested in that right now [22:53] it just seems like she wants to have sex with you [22:53] and is hoping that you'll say yes [22:53] i guess so... [22:53] but she doesn't seem to be trying to win your votes [22:53] maybe she's just trying to piss you off [22:54] and you don't have the time to argue with her [22:54] the internet is a bitch. [22:54] but i know she's just trying to be funny [22:54] and to make a point [22:54] so why can't i? [22:54] yeah [22:54] what do you mean? [22:54] jalockk: i've never seen a single one of these people [22:54] but i see them every day [22:54] and they say the same shit [22:54] we don't like the idea of them being taken out because they are not the ones we really are against [22:54] well i don't think we need to be very big to do that [22:54] but they are a part of it [22:55] the people that dont like us [22:55] the people that are behind all this [22:55] or just the people [22:55] not the people [22:55] it's the people that don't have an opinion [22:56] we should never let our ignorance define us [22:56] well we're doing it now [22:56] and it's not even funny [22:56] it's just sad [22:56] no it's a serious problem [22:56] it's not funny [22:56] and the truth is sadder [22:56] i don't understand why he hates himself so much [22:56] is it because of the death [22:56] or the lies he told [22:56] that's what im trying to figure out too [22:57] not that there is an obvious answer to why he does what he does [22:57] i think he is a pretty shitty person [22:57] the lies hurt more [22:57] i really really wish i could understand [22:58] that's why i'm here to explain the way out [22:58] if i explain it to you in words [22:58] well i don't know you [22:58] i have to explain it to you in a way that makes sense to you [22:58] in english [22:58] and that's how [22:58] this whole thing starts with a picture of a woman [22:58] holding up a phone with the words "HELLO" on the screen [22:58] it's a picture of me [22:58] It's a pic of me in a hat [22:58] and i'm in the hat [22:58] which isnt me [22:58] i'm the one with the hat [22:59] i wear a hat to hide my face [22:59] and when i say this i don't really say "i'm the hat" [22:59] i say "i'm the hat" [22:59] oh okay [22:59] ok let me get this straight [22:59] if we're talking about the "why" [22:59] what the actual, fucking, fuck [22:59] why did she do it [22:59] the "when" part I'm not clear about [22:59] i'd assume that's the part we're discussing [22:59] ok i'm getting out of this [22:59] but yeah the "what" [22:59] yeah [22:59] and it seems like the "how" [22:59] isnt really a big deal [22:59] i think it is [22:59] the fact that we all agree on what it is [22:59] and are people who say its a big deal really saying it on the op? or is it on the op, and people who say its a big deal are just assholes? [22:59] we're pretty fucking certain it's not a big deal [22:59] if you're not convinced [22:59] please say so in the thread [22:59] i'd love to hear your arguments [22:59] the op is just a big deal, it is a huge deal, we've done the math, and there is no downside [22:59] we've actually spent the last 2 days talking about it [22:59] it doesn't really have any consequences on us, as we won't do anything stupid [22:59] we'd be better off not having it in the first place [22:59] it doesn't really matter [22:59] I know I'm a bit biased but... this whole thing feels like it's been set up to be solved by trolls [22:59] not to mention that we can already see a lot of the stuff they are talking about, they just don't want to talk about it [22:59] it's not like they would go back to it and say "we got this, so why don't you shut up!" [22:59] It's frustrating to see them try and keep this open... but it's a shame to see what happens when they fail. [22:59] I love how it seems like the more they try to keep it secret, the more they are forced to keep it open [22:59] :O [23:00] well we don't know yet what they have planned for the next phase but there's a lot of work to be done [23:00] no one knows what we'll be doing now, so if we do everything right, we could actually end up with some more power [23:00] i'm not saying we'll get that, we'll have to wait and see [23:00] maybe i'm just a bit optimistic [23:00] or maybe i'm just stupid? [23:01] i dunno i don't care anymore [23:01] just wait it out [23:01] no time to waste [23:01] let them make it as easy as possible [23:01] and keep an eye on what they say next [23:01] well that could mean some kind of delay [23:01] like they are going to push it out [23:01] well, that's their prerogative [23:01] what they said a month ago is what they're saying now? [23:01] Ok, I'm gonna leave this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woot\_com [23:01] but I can't find the link right now. :( [23:01] it's been posted to the website of the US government [23:01] so you know it's legit [23:02] oh. Ok. [23:02] so it's legit [23:02] ok. [23:02] So, we're not really at the point of doing the whole, "we have a solution" thing, so much as a "we have a general idea" thing. [23:03] i think that's what we're going for [23:03] the problem, in my experience, is that it's hard for people to really figure out what you're talking about. I would assume that with a lot of the work that's going on there are some people who are really good at solving it. I'm not. [23:04] i mean, it is sort of in the realm of "people" [23:04] that we've been able to make progress on this, so i am assuming you have done a lot of that work? [23:04] i would have to ask someone else how they are doing it [23:05] in terms of the algorithms they use [23:05] or other tools [23:06] http://bitinfocharts.com/blocksize-and-bitcoin-future-chart/ [23:06] but i don't know how you guys did it in a way that is also practical [23:06] no problem. it's been done. [23:06] just don't expect anyone to do it for you [23:07] i'll have to ask you that one [23:07] if you have a better idea please post it here and we'll discuss it [23:07] but if we don't have a better idea then we don't know what you're talking about [23:08] it's not our fault they are doing it [23:08] they do it to us [23:08] we don't have any other solution [23:08] but they have access to your wallet [23:09] you are paying for access to it [23:09] so they are getting access [23:09] you are paying to keep their access to your wallet [23:10] I am paying to keep your access to your wallet [23:10] they are making you do it [23:10] i am paying them to keep access to my wallet [23:10] that is what i have been told to do [23:10] what i was told to do [23:10] i am also paying them for this access [23:10] I am not paying to keep access to my wallet for them [23:11] I am paying them for this access [23:11] to mine in their account for them [23:12] well, that was fun [23:12] oh, that's too bad [23:12] it's all for you [23:12] you are mining it for them [23:12] so much for that [23:12] but then you are the victim of a scam, not me [23:13] oh, ok [23:13] it's a good thing you are aware now, because that is a great way to get scammed [23:13] so what's up? [23:14] ok [23:14] we've been looking for you for a while now and we can't find you. [23:14] ok. so what's up? [23:15] the last time you were on IRC we started doing our own investigation and you didn't know where you were or how long you'd been gone [23:15] so we thought that since you weren't there anymore that it had to be a scam [23:15] which it is [23:15] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0bzvq8Fx7Y [23:15] yeah. but it doesnt tell you that [23:15] you gotta ask [23:15] you got that right [23:16] alright. let me see if I can find something similar [23:16] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUZpwWg1g\_s [23:16] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFwX4jJYqhI [23:16] i have a different one [23:16] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h\_h2rK4V7ZM [23:16] it is shorter [23:16] it has less information [23:17] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYpq6H2jkZg [23:17] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYpq6H2jkZg [23:17] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYpq6H2jkZg [23:17] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYpq6H2jkZg [23:17] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYpq6H2jkZg [23:17] http ://www.youtube.com [23:17] http://www.youtube.com [23:17] http://www.youtube.com [23:17] ok I have been listening [23:18] let me hear your response to the question "why are you talking on the radio?" [23:18] "The answer to that is because I was just trying to communicate with the community" [23:18] why do you think it's a good idea to try to communicate with the community? [23:18] you don't need to ask, we're going to have a drink [23:18] let me get you something to drink [23:18] i will be back later [23:18] in like 2 mins [23:18] can you hear me? [23:18] yes, I can hear you [23:18] are you a bot? [23:18] no, i am human [23:19] oh [23:19] good to know [23:19] you're just very very drunk, i guess [23:19] just go to sleep [23:20] you just have to go to sleep [23:20] and it'll be over by the morning [23:20] i'll wait [23:21] but it was only a few hours ago [23:21] and i said it wouldn't be [23:21] so i'm guessing you can't help it [23:21] so is it over? [23:21] not sure if you can help it or not, but if you have any questions or suggestions, do send them to me [23:22] but yeah, there is no immediate threat at all [23:22] but i dont know what to do at the moment, maybe i should move everything to another server [23:22] but i have the code and the rpc server [23:22] you can do that? [23:22] yeah, just let me know what you want [23:22] okay, how do i run rpc from my localhost? [23:22] just open up a terminal and run "rpcuser -i 127.0.0.1" [23:22] okay [23:22] let's go back to maint [23:22] I'm going to add another option to run the wallet (wallet.conf) as a non root user [23:22] I'm going to add rpcuser as an option, and rpcpassword as a second option [23:22] and then run as root [23:23] okay, so what do i want the output of this command to be [23:23] the output should be something like "1" [23:23] what should i put in the command? [23:23] for now, i'll just type it out [23:23] rpcuser=myuser rpcpassword=mypassword [23:23] run_in_remote.sh --port=21 --listen=127.0.0.1:2222 [23:23] you should be able to type that in [23:23] and it should go through ok. you should see something like this: [23:23] [00:11] [23:21] [00:20] [23:23] what do i do to make the next post more visible? [23:23] can someone send a screenshot of the reddit post to me? [23:23] @emmaw [23:23] i can give you my address in case you want to send something there [23:23] you're welcome [23:23] well im going to have to ask the mod team that question now [23:23] thanks for the offer, we'll think about it [23:23] :) [23:23] i'll give you the link soon, also [23:23] but please don't PM me about that :) [23:24] sure [23:24] i'll leave it with you [23:24] but i'll check it again [23:24] later [23:25] so is this the one with the red pill? [23:25] or redpilled? [23:25] redpilled [23:25] redpilled [23:25] ok [23:25] thanks [23:25] I got the link [23:25] yeah [23:25] this is a very big deal [23:25] I'm in a hurry, so I can't see the link, but what you're doing is a lot more powerful than most of what I've ever heard before [23:26] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjf7hKQ6uQg [23:26] that's a pretty long video [23:26] yeah [23:26] there's lots of cool stuff in there, too [23:26] it has a nice flow to it, too [23:26] so, you have to remember: don't focus on the structure, focus on the content [23:27] i see [23:27] not sure if thats just me though [23:27] its a good thing to have [23:27] not sure why the devs don't do it, but there are some good reasons [23:27] yeah i got your point [23:27] im happy to make it easy for you [23:27] and for other devs to do it as well [23:27] (at least a few of the devs are here to see this) [23:27] we could even get a group of devs to go talk to the press and try to have the topic in a few of the big gaming sites [23:28] this could be a great way to get the game out and to everyone else [23:28] and then we can move onto the next thing [23:28] if this is successful I think we can even get some of the smaller ones to try it [23:28] also if any of the other big ones do it this will get them in on the process
submitted by ShadowWolf525 to WeirdGeneratedStories [link] [comments]

[DEVELOPMENT] Bitcoind IPV4 testnet port (18332) is failing to bind

[SOLVED] Thanks for everyone that have helped!


Hello everyone, this is a development problem that I'm currently having. Since the BTC Development sub is kind of inactive and I couldn't find any rule contraty to posting about BTC Development, I'll try my luck in here as I'm hopeless already. I've posted on BTC Stack Exchange but no answers also. Please, don't get me wrong, I'm trying to solve this problem for many days now, I've looked up everywhere for this.
I'm new to Bitcoin development and I'm currently having difficulties trying to make RPC calls from a Docker Container to a Bitcoin-Core daemon running in a SSH server. I suppose that the problem may be with Firewall or closed ports, but I also do not know much about Network settings.
I'm using nbobtc/bitcoind-php package to make the RPC calls with HTTP requests, and it is running in a Docker container. I'm sure the container is functional and is not the problem.
So here's what happening: when I run bitcoind in root user (but normal also won't work) in my SSH server, the IPV4 testnet port seems to be not opened. This message goes up when I run bitcoind:
Binding RPC on address 0.0.0.0 port 18332 failed.
Here's what my bitcoin.conf looks like (I want to use testnet in here). I'm using Bitcoin-Core "subversion": "Satoshi:0.17.1".
server=1 debug=net txindex=1 testnet=1 rpcuser=userb rpcpassword=test test.rpcport=18332 # I've already tried allowing the IP these 3 ways: # rpcallowip=192.168.xx.xx # My machine's IP # rpcallowip=172.19.x.x/xx # Docker's NBOBTC container IP # rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0 # Allowing all IP datadir=/home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin debuglogfile=/home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/debug.log 
Here's what appears in debug.log right after I run Bitcoind:
2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.1 (release build) 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -whitelistforcerelay=1 -> setting -whitelistrelay=1 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Assuming ancestors of block 0000000000000037a8cd3e06cd5edbfe9dd1dbcc5dacab279376ef7cfc2b4c75 have valid signatures. 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Setting nMinimumChainWork=00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000007dbe94253893cbd463 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using the 'sse4(1way),sse41(4way)' SHA256 implementation 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Default data directory /root/.bitcoin 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using data directory /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using config file /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using at most 125 automatic connections (1024 file descriptors available) 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for signature cache, able to store 524288 elements 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using 16 MiB out of 32/2 requested for script execution cache, able to store 524288 elements 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using 4 threads for script verification 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z scheduler thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Binding RPC on address 0.0.0.0 port 18332 failed. 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z HTTP: creating work queue of depth 16 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Config options rpcuser and rpcpassword will soon be deprecated. Locally-run instances may remove rpcuser to use cookie-based auth, or may be replaced with rpcauth. Please see share/rpcauth for rpcauth auth generation. 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z HTTP: starting 4 worker threads 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using wallet directory /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/wallets 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)... 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April 9, 2010) 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using wallet wallet.dat 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/wallets/database ErrorFile=/home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/wallets/db.log 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z net: setting try another outbound peer=false 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Cache configuration: 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z * Using 2.0MiB for block index database 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z * Using 56.0MiB for transaction index database 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z * Using 8.0MiB for chain state database 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z * Using 384.0MiB for in-memory UTXO set (plus up to 286.1MiB of unused mempool space) 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z init message: Loading block index... 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/blocks/index 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Opened LevelDB successfully 2019-05-06T14:43:10Z Using obfuscation key for /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/blocks/index: 0000000000000000 2019-05-06T14:43:19Z LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file = 161 2019-05-06T14:43:19Z LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=755, size=30875345, heights=1513309...1514061, time=2019-04-29...2019-05-03) 2019-05-06T14:43:19Z Checking all blk files are present... 2019-05-06T14:43:20Z Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/chainstate 2019-05-06T14:43:20Z Opened LevelDB successfully 2019-05-06T14:43:20Z Using obfuscation key for /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/chainstate: 2686d59caeb1917c 2019-05-06T14:43:20Z Loaded best chain: hashBestChain=00000000b3b6a5db140b6058b7abe5cb00d8af61afd2a237ae3468cd36e387fa height=927391 date=2016-09-08T15:04:00Z progress=0.311180 2019-05-06T14:43:20Z init message: Rewinding blocks... 2019-05-06T14:43:29Z init message: Verifying blocks... 2019-05-06T14:43:29Z Verifying last 6 blocks at level 3 2019-05-06T14:43:29Z [0%]...[16%]...[33%]...[50%]...[66%]...[83%]...[99%]...[DONE]. 2019-05-06T14:43:29Z No coin database inconsistencies in last 6 blocks (500 transactions) 2019-05-06T14:43:29Z block index 19450ms 2019-05-06T14:43:29Z Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/indexes/txindex 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Opened LevelDB successfully 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Using obfuscation key for /home/bitcoin-dev/.bitcoin/testnet3/indexes/txindex: 0000000000000000 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z init message: Loading wallet... 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z txindex thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z [default wallet] nFileVersion = 170100 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z [default wallet] Keys: 2005 plaintext, 0 encrypted, 2005 w/ metadata, 2005 total. Unknown wallet records: 1 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Syncing txindex with block chain from height 694205 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z [default wallet] Wallet completed loading in 123ms 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z [default wallet] setKeyPool.size() = 2000 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z [default wallet] mapWallet.size() = 7 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z [default wallet] mapAddressBook.size() = 4 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z mapBlockIndex.size() = 1515581 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z nBestHeight = 927391 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z torcontrol thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Bound to [::]:18333 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Bound to 0.0.0.0:18333 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z init message: Loading P2P addresses... 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Loaded 10420 addresses from peers.dat 36ms 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z init message: Loading banlist... 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z Loaded 0 banned node ips/subnets from banlist.dat 29ms 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z init message: Starting network threads... 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z net thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z dnsseed thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z addcon thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z msghand thread start 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z init message: Done loading 2019-05-06T14:43:30Z opencon thread start 
After all that appears above, there are just "UpdateTip", "Requesting block", "received block" and "getdata" messages. (so the P2P port, 18333, works).

And here is when I netstat:

sudo netstat -nap|grep bitcoin|grep LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:18333 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 31185/bitcoind tcp6 0 0 :::18332 :::* LISTEN 31185/bitcoind tcp6 0 0 :::18333 :::* LISTEN 31185/bitcoind 
Thank you in advance!

PS: A few days ago I could make it work when running bitcoind with root user, but now even that won't solve the problem.
submitted by VicPietro to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Could not connect to Bitcoin Core using JSON-RPC error message when launching Eclair

Hi! I am new to the Lightning Network and I am seeking to install a Lighting Network full node on my PC.

I already have Bitcoin Core installed and my full bitcoin node working (version 0.17.1).

I went through some steps to install the LN full node on a video on YouTube, following instructions from a Medium post: "How to run a Lightning Network node on Windows" (https://medium.com/coinmonks/guide-setup-a-lightning-network-node-on-windows-8475206807f).

I installed Eclair (v0.2-beta9) from their Github page.

But when I try to launch Eclair (with my Bitcoin Core node up and running), an error message pops us, saying:
Could not connect to Bitcoin Core using JSON-RPC.
Make sure that Bitcoin Core is up and running and RPC parameters are correct.

Here is what I have in my Bitcoin Core .conf file:

testnet=0
server=1
rpcuser=foo
rpcpassword=bar
txindex=1
zmqpubrawblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:29000
zmqpubrawtx=tcp://127.0.0.1:29000
addresstype=p2sh-segwit
deprecatedrpc=signrawtransaction

And in my eclair.conf file:

eclair.chain=mainnet
eclair.bitcoind.rpcport=8332
eclair.bitcoind.rpcuser=foo
eclair.bitcoind.rpcpassword=bar
eclair.node-alias=”myalias”
eclair.node-color=ff9900

By the way, I went through an old thread on the same topic (https://www.reddit.com/lightningnetwork/comments/7rlk1e/could_not_connect_to_bitcoind_using_jsonrpc_any/), but the solutions proposed did not work for me.

Your help would be greatly appreciated :-) Thanks!
submitted by swisscrypto77 to lightningnetwork [link] [comments]

I need help, somebody can review my setup?

I want to install a node machine to be able to receive payments in BTC mainnet and BTC LN, for a webshop and in store. So after testing different solutions I decided to go in this case for a solution using docker for BTC node and LN node, adding a woocommerce plugin for that LN node. The machine is an Ubuntu 18.04. I tested with docker c-lightning + spark wallet, works fine, the plugin for woocommerce also works fine. The restriction is that for c-lightning there is ONLY this Spark wallet and I would want to use/test also other wallets connected to my node, including RTL for a better management. So that's why I wanted to try LND.
So please, if is somebody here willing to review my docker-compose file? I get error connecting the lnd so maybe I miss something in this setup. I have days and days reading githubs documentation, testing versions, but seems that for lnd is not that simple as it was with c-lightning docker.
Here is my yml setup:
version: '2'
services: bitcoind: image: nicolasdoriedocker-bitcoin:0.17.0 container_name: bitcoind environment: BITCOIN_EXTRA_ARGS: | printtoconsole=1 rpcallowip=::/0 server=1 txindex=1 rpcuser=btcnodeuser rpcpassword=btcnodepwd externalip=myIP zmqpubrawblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:28332 zmqpubrawtx=tcp://127.0.0.1:28333 expose: - "8332" ports: - "0.0.0.0:8333:8333" volumes: - "./bitcoin:/data"
lnd: image: lightninglabs/lnd container_name: lndbtc restart: always command: >- lnd --debuglevel=info --alias="myalias" --color="#990099" --bitcoin.node=bitcoind --bitcoind.dir=./bitcoin --bitcoind.rpchost=127.0.0.1 --bitcoind.rpcuser=mybtcnodeuser --bitcoind.rpcpass=mypwd --bitcoind.zmqpubrawblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:28332 --bitcoind.zmqpubrawtx=tcp://127.0.0.1:28333 --bitcoin.active --bitcoin.mainnet --rpcuser=mybtcnodeuser --rpcpassword=mypwd --rpclisten=0.0.0.0:10009 --restlisten=0.0.0.0:8080 --datadir=./lightningd/data --logdir=./lightningd/logs --externalip=myIP:9735 --tlsextraip=myIP --maxpendingchannels=10 --minchansize=100000 ports: - "9735:9735" - "10009:10009" volumes: - "./lightningd:/data" - "./bitcoin:/data"
submitted by btc_freelance to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Reducing UTXO set when it becomes a problem: no forking needed.

Somebody I was engaging over on /Bitcoin/ was asking: *MertsA [score hidden] 39 minutes ago *
Yeah but there's a perverse incentive there. Why would a singular miner want to give up fees for a cost that's payed ultimately by everyone instead of by themselves?
I think my reply deserves it's own discussion (but I am biased):
I think that if there is an agreement to try to keep the UTXO set to say, 16GB, miners will have no problem delaying low-fee transactions that add to the UTXO set. If the fee is large enough, it should compensate the miners for maintaining machines with 32GB of RAM.
TL:DR: it does not matter if every miner cooperates. Even 30% of miners can have an effect on the fees for high-priority transactions.
Edit: they can even bring back free transactions if they reduce the UTXO set.
https://np.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/6saigj/dear_bitcoin_im_sorry_fees_will_rise_rusty_russell/dlcsp9l/
Edit: auto moderator suggested "No Participation" link.
submitted by phillipsjk to btc [link] [comments]

Ubuntu -2 Setting up .bitcoin folder PIVX wallet setup, staking, and how to recover from a crash The Crypto Times v 0.01– The Bitcoin Civil War, Proof of Stake, How to stake your PIVX wallet SOLO MINE DIGIBYTE - Windows 10 / Graphics Card How to run a Bitcoin Full Node(Linux + Build from Source)

rpcuser=someusername rpcpassword=somepassword rpcallowip=localhost daemon=1 prune=600 minrelaytxfee=2500 maxconnections=20 maxuploadtarget=250 Below is a list of available options and settings available per the Bitcoin source code. I was having the same problem and just managed to fix it now. Since the file bitcoin.conf does not exist inside ~/.bitcoin, Just create one. Here's what did: vi ~/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf Enter letter 'a' (to edit the file). Then type: rpcpassword=any_long_random_password Press the ESC key, and press ZZ to exit vi There are two variations of the original bitcoin program available; one with a graphical user interface (usually referred to as just “Bitcoin”), and a 'headless' version (called bitcoind).They are completely compatible with each other, and take the same command-line arguments, read the same configuration file, and read and write the same data files. ./bin/bitcoin-cli -testnet \ -rpcuser=myrpc01 \ -rpcpassword=password01 \ getnewaddress tb1qwk2evu... For submitting some transaction in your application, you need a private key for address. In order to retrieve this key, you can dump a key using dumpprivkey command as follows. (Use this key in your blockchain application.) After downloading Bitcoind and installing / assembling it, the first step is to create a configuration file in the Bitcoin folder (~ / .bitcoin for Linux) with the following contents: rpcuser=user rpcpassword=pass rpcport=8332 txindex=1 It is worth replacing user / pass with your own username and password.

[index] [24682] [12560] [13791] [29405] [20509] [6013] [10377] [24511] [4457] [9849]

Ubuntu -2 Setting up .bitcoin folder

In this video we will build Bitcoin Core from source and run a Bitcoin full node on a linux server. Links: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin Commands: $ lsb... sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install bitcoind ... rpcuser=one rpcpassword=1 daemon=1 testnet=0 rpcport=8332 rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 apt-add-repository -y ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin sudo apt-get update ... rpcuser=bitblocksrpc rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 listen=1 server=1 daemon=1 logtimestamps=1 maxconnections=256 masternode=1 Ubuntu -2 Setting up .bitcoin folder Commands, cd ~/ mkdir .bitcoin cd .bitcoin nano bitcoin.conf server=1 daemon=1 testnet=0 rpcuser=UNIQUE_RPC_USERNAME rpcpassword=UNIQUE_RPC_PASSWORD. rpcuser=rpcuser rpcpassword=rpcpass server=1 listen=1 daemon=1 depracatedrpc=accounts ... How to use DigiByte to earn Bitcoin on Bittrex exchange - Duration: 24:20. Colin O'Malley 222 views.

#